Britain Equality Ethics Politics USA

Is Prince Harry Amongst the Prophets Also? CT

This weeks article in Christian Today – you can read the original here..

When King Saul prophesied at Naioth at Ramah, the people were so surprised that it became a proverbial saying: “Is Saul also among the prophets?”

I thought of this when listening to Prince Harry’s speech to the UN last week. He spoke movingly in his sermon – for sermon it was – of his mother and of Nelson Mandela. But then he moved into specific political and moral issues where he delivered the ‘gospel’ according to progressive doctrine. His three points were climate change, disinformation and abortion.

A prophet declares the word of the Lord, so let’s see how prophetic Harry was. On climate change, as with the other list of disasters he mentioned, he spoke of how he understood and knew people’s pain. He was certainly right to point out that it is the poor who bear the brunt, not only of climate change, but also the measures taken by the wealthy to combat it.

Think for example of the people of Sri Lanka, whose super wealthy president decided to enamour himself to his WEF admirers by banning fertilisers. As a result, crops failed, people went hungry, riots ensued, and he was forced to flee the country.

Prince Harry never has to worry about heating or cooling his Californian mansion, or how much trips home to the the UK to see his family will cost. Or indeed, how many holidays he and Meghan can have. His ability to empathise with those who cannot afford heating bills or expensive food is somewhat limited.

Harry on Abortion

Given he was standing on the same ‘green’ ground as his father, Harry obviously felt safe to weigh in with his considered opinion and calculated empathy. But it was when he turned to the politics of his new home country that he displayed a lack of political awareness and of moral probity.Comparing the war in Ukraine with the ruling of the US Supreme Court on abortion, he pronounced that this was “a global assault on democracy and freedom”, and an erosion of constitutional rights.

This is the same Prince Harry who pronounced that the constitutional right to freedom of speech was “bonkers”. Perhaps he has discovered a newfound respect for the US constitution? If so, he should read it before making pronouncements on the world stage.

The US constitution does not mention abortion and there is no constitutional right within it. It does however mention a right to ‘privacy’ and on that somewhat nebulous basis, this was used as an excuse to declare a constitutional right to abortion.No serious constitutional lawyer, whatever their view on abortion, would take that as a plain reading of the text. All the Supreme Court did was right this wrong and send the right to decide on abortion back to the State legislatures – the people who are elected to make laws. That is what democracy is.

The irony is that Prince Harry was not speaking to the UN as someone who was elected by the people, nor as someone who had made his own way in life. Rather he was there because of the greatest white privilege of all – being brought up in the Royal Family! He can hardly speak as the democratic representative of the people.

On the question of abortion, Harry again seems not to have thought the issue through. His wife had a “guttural” reaction to it – one which Harry as a self-proclaimed ‘feminist’ shared. But the argument about abortion cannot be reduced to the ‘guttural’ reactions of the rich and powerful. Especially when they tell us that letting democratic representatives determine local policy is somehow on a par with the war in Ukraine!

Harry Speaking for the Many

He then spoke about “the few, weaponizing lies and disinformation at the expense of the many”. Clearly, he was putting himself on the side of the many – the poor, oppressed, voiceless classes with whom he shared such empathy. He too feels battered. He understands.

I doubt it. This is a man who gets invited to speak at the UN on the basis of his parentage, who has a new book coming out (for which he will have been paid a substantial advance), a Netflix deal worth a reported $100m, and a Spotify deal worth $75 million. He and his wife are being paid for this not because of their talents, philosophies or communication skills. It is entirely because of their celebrity caused by the privilege of their inherited or wed into position. In other words, Harry is one of the ‘few’ he is complaining about. And on the topic of ‘disinformation’, his critics might have something to say about that.

The Real Prophets

No, Prince Harry is not among the prophets. I would say he is a lost soul in search of a purpose. He reminds me of Pink Floyd’s “Wish you were Here”, the words of which go, “We’re just two lost souls, swimming in a fishbowl, year after year. Running over the same old ground, what have we found? The same old fears.”

Kings such as David, Solomon and Hezekiah were also prophets, and political leaders from Constantine to Scott Morrison have professed their faith in Christ and sought to live according to his word. There have also been poorer prophets who have spoken truth to power without themselves being the powerful.

Watching Harry’s speech reminded me of how much we need the truly prophetic – not clichés, memes or fantasy. We need the reality of what the Lord says – backed up by what we do. I have just been going through the book of Revelation and it is amazing how apposite it is. In chapter 6, we are told of the four horsemen of the apocalypse – war, violence and civil strife; famine and inflation; and finally, disease and death.

But there is only one who can defeat them (and the kings of this earth and the merchants who serve Babylon). That is the rider on the white horse in Revelation 19. He is the Word of God and He is the One the true prophets proclaim. May all the kings and princes of this earth “kiss him” or “your way will lead to your destruction” (Psalm 2).

David Robertson runs The ASK Project in Sydney, Australia. He blogs at the Wee Flea.

Coffee and Revelation 35 – The Servant’s Seal

Quantum 208 – London’s Burning – Prince Harry, the Saviour of America

Harry, Meghan and Oprah: An interview fit for a kingless society

What the Supreme Court decision on Roe v Wade means for the West and the Church – CT



  1. I suspect Harry, who was never very bright to begin with, is now little more than an empty shell through which the voice of his odious wife speaks. He has limited education, no real life experience and no expertise of any kind. He has lived a sheltered life of luxury and has no idea what ordinary people value or are going through. He is one of the protected few who will never have to give up any of his luxuries for the green agenda.

  2. “We need the truly prophetic”.

    I have no argument wiht that reality. But who will step up to that responsibility when it means being without honour among your own people, wiht people taking offence in response to your words, being furious and wanting to throw you off a cliff metaphorically i.e. cancel you?

    It’s not a position for wimps and perhaps why few people first have the calling to godly prophecy, and second are willing to go through what it takes to develop the strength of character to faithfully carry out the office of being a friend whose wounds can be trusted rather than an enemy of good who showers with kisses i.e. empty platitudes.

  3. Harry has not been the same since he married Hollywood Megan. She seeks fame and fortune rather than the common good and he has fallen into her intricate web of doing her bidding to keep her happy at all costs. More’s the pity that the Royal family has been divided by such a one as she. I think that Jezebel has met her match!

  4. Are abortion of personhood, debate, thought and freedom, all related to a legal or political campaign to make clinical abortion a right? ‘I think, therefore I am’. Is Harry’s ability to think impaired?

  5. Harry, Harry, Harry You are a guest in the United States Of America. We do not want to hear from privileged carpet baggers.

  6. Totally agree David on your very accurate synopsis of Harry…
    The problem is that he will never see his ignorance through his dim witted wife.., and will only be out there for so-, called celebrity.., power and fame…

    Both dim wits will never actually get that.., and they should be banned to live in ‘Hotel California ‘ forever and for sure…

  7. Harry is among the Prophets of Karl Marx . KM was the eponymous instigator of Christianity’s final Reformation , that is to say , the successful promoter of an ostensibly irreligious religion.

    That crazy old Marxist , Tony Benn , had an American mother who dinned into him tall tales of the OT and so TB’s socialism had its etiology in the conflict between Kings and Prophets .

    Benn became an atheist but the Leftist residue of what he learned at his mother’s knee ( and other low joints ) ensured that his “free thinking” was just another socialist chimera.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

%d bloggers like this: