England

Rod Liddle – Selfish Whining Monkeys.. A Review – Part 1

download

The subtitle of this book is how we ended up greedy, narcissistic and unhappy. It doesn’t sound cheerful reading! But it is absolutely brilliant. Liddle is a superb writer – humorous, observant, and biting. He does not write from a Christian perspective but there is much in here that I could resonate with.   One warning – one of the weak points about the book is the regular use of the ‘F word’….

if you don’t want to read the whole thing then I’ve identified 25 characteristics of our generation that he speaks about. I’m not saying that I agree with every single one of them, but it certainly makes for fascinating reading and provokes to thought.   Enjoy!

1) The Selfish Generation –

“I, and my generation, seen by contrast feckless and irresponsible, endlessly selfish, whining, avaricious, self-deluding, self obsessed, spoiled and corrupt and ill. We are the generation that spent the small but hard earned inheritance we got from our hard-working parents (mine went on that most irresponsible and selfish of all our new and expensive freedoms, divorce lawyers), and are now busy spending the money we should be leaving to our kids.” P.9

2) The Lost Generation –

“It is hard to argue against longer life expectancy, greater affluence, safer workplaces, the freedom to escape from a hopeless marriage, the rights of women to be treated equally, and so on. But a certain moral code has been lost along the way, which has contributed largely to our country becoming close to bankrupt, a nation of broken families clamouring about their entitlements siring ill educated and undisciplined kids unfamiliar with the concept of right and wrong, where there is an ever diminishing sense of community and belonging, a perpetual transience, if you fancy a cheap oxymoron.”p. 10

“peace has made us complacent, freedom has made us irresponsible, affluence has made us acquisitive, comfort has made us neglectful of others, and security has made us – oddly enough – tremblingly insecure.” Page 11

3) The Proud Generation

“This is what happens when we are freed from the requirement to be humble, to bow down, to accept that we are deeply flawed and are inclined – when liberated from the suspicion that someone powerful and vengeful and probably bad-tempered is watching everything we do – to behave rather badly, and with a consuming arrogance. We build things to praise ourselves, and then, having finally abolished God, we become a God to ourselves. We become gripped by intimations of our own brilliance.” Page 15.

“It is no coincidence that this rapid erosion of deference to an omnipotent, unseen other has occurred in tandem with the growth of institutionalised self obsession, self-pity and public emoting.” Page 18

4) The Heartless Generation

“It is undoubtedly true that as orthodox religious belief has retreated, so we have become more nakedly individualistic, more inclined to be immune to the needs and requirements of our fellow men. I suspect there is a correlation.” Page 20

5) The Greedy Generation

 “credit, as it exists in its ubiquity today, is a con trick perpetuated upon the poorest and the most vulnerable in society. It doles out an illusory wealth which has, over the decades, disguised the extent to which the incomes of the richest and the incomes of the poorest have become ever more polarised, the trickle down that never really happened and was never really expected to happen, if we are being honest. The poor get their shit stuff, for a while, until it is repossessed along with their oldest daughter, and maybe they forget that they are earning only 1/200 of the salary – excluding bonuses – of their chief executive, whereas 40 years ago they be on about one 20th as much as the boss.” Page 30.

6) The Impatient Generation

“This waiting is the thing my generation no longer does, is no longer cool with. It does not wait for anything. It does not see why it should. Life’s too short, isn’t it? Paradoxically, life was rather shorter back when people did way – still they waited.” Page 34.

7) The ‘Flexible’ Generation

“Flexible, then, as understood by Mr Starkey, is a synonym – a euphemism, if you like – for xxxx cheap. The reason British businesses employ Eastern European labour is that they can pay them 3/5 of xxx all and get away with it; it is nothing to do with a reluctance on the part of the British worker to shift his indolent fat arse and travel a few miles for a job. The Poles and Slovaks have very low overheads here, and a much lower cost of living back home. They don’t have families to support in this country, by and large, so they work for less. Have you noticed how minicab fares haven’t risen much recently, or sometimes gone down? You can probably work out why that is when you listen to the drivers accident.” – Page 42

8) The Homeless Generation

“And back at home moving, always moving; having an investment only in the baldest sense of the word, in the mortgage. Having no investment in the community you live in, and the people who live around you, because you’re always ready to move on again, to buy bigger and better, and thus trouser more almost wholly imaginary money. As a consequence, the poorest of us – an ever-growing proportion – are forced into private-sector lettings, because there are no council houses left.” Page 49.

‘’ we replaced the communal with the sopilistic, the acquisitive and the narcissistic.“. Page 51.

9) The Blameless Generation

“We are, as Richard Hoggart put it in The way We Live Now, riding a wave of relativism – ‘the obsessive avoidance of judgements of quality, or moral judgement ‘; there is no blame to be attached to anything anyone does; we should not judge, we should not blame. And so, of course, as a consequence, people come to expect not to be judged and not to be blamed. People who cannot work because they are ‘disabled ‘by, say, alcoholism or obesity, but who nonetheless have several children to support, do not remotely blame themselves for giving their kids an awful life – they blame you, and me, and society. And they will demand, as a right, a larger house, and therefore a larger bill for you and me to pay, because the notion that they should look out for themselves a little bit either has not occurred to them, or has occurred to them but appals them in its apparent callousness.” Page 59.

10) The Atomised Generation

“This moronic fugue, this howling – that I have been transgressed, or I am a victim, or I demand redress, or simply and exultantly LOOK! I AM! – is the conscious expression of a society which, underneath, is fractured into a million different parts and no longer has any sense of itself as a cohesive whole, and therefore with a concomitant moral responsibility to others. What we have instead is an infinitely atomised morass of acquisitiveness and complaint and insularity and braggadocio”. Page 64.

“In a sense, the free market, and this perpetual demand for choice, is another expression of our modern individual narcissism, and our insularity: we alone know best.” Page 183.

“The thesis is that choice has made us happier. This control we now have has given us better lifes. Has it?” Page 185.

11) The Generation of the Sixties and Eighties

“from the 60s we acquired the insistence upon self-expression and the overthrowing of a conservative social agenda in favour of one in which, after a fashion, anything went and was beyond all reproof. A reaction, of course, against the buttoned up, constrained and often absurd stoicism of the preceding generation. And as those free-living and endlessly expensive baby boomers get older and wealthier, so their individualistic demands drove them to the political right. From the 1980s we received the human right to be endlessly, pointlessly acquisitive, to look after our own interests and XXX the needs of the rest, to deny – a la the prime minister of the time – that such a thing as society even existed.. “Page 64.

12) The Divorced Generation

“beyond that, though it was a betrayal of my boys. Having made the decision to have children, I should have stuck with it. But I didn’t; my personal happiness seemed to count for more than anything else.” Page 75.

 “The loosening of the divorce laws, and the swift removal of stigma from those who have been divorced, came from the top down. It was designed to enable the more affluent in society to continue to pursue that most compulsive of post-1960 pastimes, serial monogamy.” Page 76.…

 Like so much socially liberal legislation presented to the electorate as a wonderful means of acquiring those most liberal of things, freedom and equality, divorce reform benefited only the well-off, by and large. It was legislation designed to enable the affluent to XXXX around with impunity, (no fault, remember!), And hang the rest. Hang the kids. Children from broken homes make up 80% of the population of Britain psychiatric units……. Whoever the 1971 divorce format was brought into ‘enable ‘, it was certainly not the children. It was not the children, and it was not the poor.” Page 77.

13) The Sexualised Generation

He talks about the 1970’s and Gary Glitter singing to 14 year old girls – ‘Do you wanna touch me?” What do you think he was referring to…?

Part 2 here

12 comments

  1. There may be hope for him.
    If I remember correctly, while at radio 4 he did a series on, belief, faith, with much vacillation but said he felt somehow drawn, with avery diluted affinity to the CoE.
    I too do not like the bad langauge. There is a harshness to it that makes me internally wince but it is the language of the day, of unbelievers, to be looked beyond , turn a deaf ear to in the hope of an opportunity to offer the transformative gospel. Having said that I’d change channels on the TV, or mute, or not watch in the first place, if forewarned. In my pre Christian it wouldn’t bother me. It does now.
    I occasionally read his articles in the Sunday Times (ST), which I invariably appreciate, as it challenges the spirit of the agein all its manefestations, and the language is greatly moderated. In fact I’m not sure how he gets them published as they go against the flow of much editorial ethos of the ST.

  2. By and large I agree with this:
    “This waiting is the thing my generation no longer does, is no longer cool with. It does not wait for anything.”
    Except for one thing. That is marriage and having children. The age at which people get married and the age at which they have their first child is much later than it used to be. Of course, for some, marriage is not a prerequisite of having children and they never get married. But travelling, having a career and a good time are now considered to be more immediate needs than getting married and having children.

  3. Hello Pr David

    Congratulations on your work with ScoMo and Anthony Albanese yesterday. It is wonderful that ScoMo seems sincere to you and not just all “image”. Thanks so much for your work that is already helping this country. You have covered a lot of cities in a short space of time – more than many Aussies would cover in a lifetime! I am looking forward to your impressions of Tasmania some time soon.

    This blog post on divorce, etc, reminded me of something that has been troubling me for a long time that I would like to share here. It relates to a person of my acquaintance, the minor Australian writer and blogger, Philippa Moore (now Philippa Schoon), whom I know through mutual friends. Philippa Moore who spent many years as an expatriate in London, before returning home last year.

    Philippa Moore presents a different problem from that which is discussed in this post: she married relatively young (for a member of Generation Y) but divorced within about five years. She discusses her divorce in this opinion piece she wrote for the Huffington Post:

    https://www.huffpost.com/entry/getting-divorced-in-my-20s-made-me-a-better-person_b_9360484

    We can see from the piece’s title that she actually thinks her divorce was a beneficial experience in the long term. 🙁

    Some key quotes from her piece:

    “My expectations were very unrealistic (probably unfair, too) and I adopted a very passive role in my young marriage. Keeping my husband happy was my priority, even at the expense of my own needs. And it was 2002, not 1950.”

    “I felt I was a walking contradiction in many ways — heartbroken over my failed marriage and deeply ashamed of what I felt it said about me; yet excited about the freedom and possibilities that the end of my marriage opened up for me.”

    “… as time went on, I became proud of it — both of the fact I’d got out of a marriage that wasn’t working early (rather than sticking it out for another 20 years and then leaving), and of the person I became because of it.”

    ” I learned to love my own company and to meet my own emotional needs rather than seek external validation all the time…”

    “You write your own happy ending.”

    These quotes clearly show the fundamental flaws in Philippa Moore’s worldview: she rejects the idea of marriage being about staying together through good times and bad and instead sees it as part of a quest for happiness, she rejects the idea that the female should have a passive role in the relationship and the precept of male headship and she ultimately comes to believe the delusion that true happiness comes from within and that we determine it ourselves, rather than from the Most High Source of All Happiness.

    Philippa Moore’s views ultimately lead, sadly, to a kind of hedonism as can be seen in her blog posts.

    She and her second husband, Tom Schoon, are also “woke” to the point of self-parody, as can be seen from their frequent Tweets. They tick all the boxes: pro-gay, feminist, vegetarian, environmentalist, Leftist, Hawke-Keating-supporting economic rationalists (yet simultaneously anti-Thatcherist-I have no idea how they resolve that contradiction!), pro-Greta, anti-Trump, atheistic, Remainer, anti-Scottish/Welsh independence, #MeToo supporting, yoga-practicing, hypno-therapy indulging(!), Guardian reading, etc, etc, etc…

    https://mobile.twitter.com/tomschoon/with_replies

    https://mobile.twitter.com/philippa_moore/with_replies

    I am definitely not saying this to laugh at them or to be condescending, though, just merely to point out the spiritual blindness of our times that they exemplify. We must not judge and Philippa Moore did have a difficult childhood : her father was a local celebrity breakfast radio host on a commercial FM station, which would have put some degree of pressure on her. Worse, her mother – according to many people who know her – is a contradiction who overindulged her children yet could be a pushy/overbearing bully too. These factors led to Philippa having to battle bulimia for a while and other neurotic behaviours such as hoarding. 🙁 Her second husband, Tom, also suffers from a bad anxiety disorder. One of Philippa’s younger sisters, Liz, was also affected and ran off the rails badly, becoming pregnant outside of wedlock whilst also quite young. 🙁 Philippa also had an unhappy time attending a Roman Catholic school in her childhood, so she did not encounter true religion there.

    Continued….

  4. In summary, the reason I am writing this is to show attitudes that exemplify those of at least some of the young today and how the sad, dead-end path of self-indulgence and the selfish Epicurean/hedonistic attitudes and woke SJW activism that Philippa has gone down is ultimately a dead-end. It derply troubles me that this relatively intelligent, articulate young woman has become lost in so much selfishness even as she searches for happiness and understanding in life.

    I therefore want to encourage readers to pray this heartfelt prayer that Philippa Moore and her husband and sisters will turn to Christ and realise that true, selfless happiness is truly found only in Him and not in the pleasures of this world. May they leave behind shallow, materialistic pleasures and find a life of self-sacrifice to the Lord and to each other is the only true life of love. May God grant them wisdom and maturity and lead them to His salvation through faith in His Son, Jesus Christ, our Lord – via the one true religion through faith alone by His grace alone.
    In Jesus’ name,
    Amen.

    1. Further to my comment a while ago encouraging prayer for these young people, I wish to add something else I saw today.

      Tom Schoon retweeted this militant vegan comment today. Sadly, it is not satire; the extreme fringes of the vegan movement actually believe this:

      “Life of this little piggy has much higher value than the lives of all hunters, butchers, poachers & animal farmers combined
      Change my Mind.
      #wednesdaymorning #WednesdayWisdom #WednesdayMotivation #Bacon #cheese #pork #steak #bbq #Hamburger #pizza #dinner”

      There is a photo of a piglet accompanying the tweet.

      Original source, which Schoon retweeted:

      https://mobile.twitter.com/CholesTroll/status/1207323364748091392

      Even allowing for the fact that Tom Schoon is suffering from a mild mental illness (and his wife Philippa Moore is somewhat eccentric) this is disturbing on multiple levels and shows just how twisted the morality of the secular liberal far left has become. Perhaps someone should play the vegans who wrote the original tweet at their own game and sue them for discrimination by promoting animal rights over human rights.

      I don’t believe Schoon himself is dangerous but, in the worst case scenario, some nutter in the vegan movement could be incited to kill farmers to prevent them sending livestock to the abattoirs. After all, that is what the mindset behind this tweet is endorsing: the idea that an animal’s life is worth more than a human’s.

      This is the depth to which the secular humanists can sink in their search for a godless morality; a total twisting of values and norms of morality.

      Schoon and his wife, the Tasmanian writer and blogger Philippa Moore, might be extreme cases, in taking this kind of thing seriously but they are not alone. They need our prayers more than ever now as they truly have lost their moral compass in their strange mix of hedonistic lifestyle and far left misanthropy. Please pray they will come to Christ before it is too late and leave their sinful lives and twisted, sick value system behind.

      Dear Lord God, Please enter the lives of Philippa, Tom and their families and save them. Highlight to them the sinfulness of their lives and bankrupt moral system and lead them to salvation. In the name of Christ Your Son, our Lord, Amen.

      1. Thank you so much for writing this. I will definitely pray these prayers for them. I am concerned for Philippa Moore, both because of the content of her writing for newspapers and blogs and her book and because I, too, know her as a person and I know how fragile and emotional she is. However, I also know how her “woke”/uber-liberal journalism and blogging is contributing harm to our society, undermining the sanctity of marriage, gender norms, sexual ethics and the basic tenets of morality. In this she is as culpable as every other Huffington journalist and gender-is-a-social-construct academic out there today and setting a terrible example for other impressionable young girls who may, I fear, end up making the same mistakes she is making by following this pied piper of blogging up the garden path to a dead end.

        I have known Philippa’s parents for many years. I am aware that many people don’t like Sylvia because she is so overbearing and very aggressively protective of her children – I have witnessed her do that myself and it has disturbed me to see it – but I have always personally got on well with her. I know a lot of people accuse her of being a bully. Apparently she even chased off one of Liz’s potential suitors, which is a shame. Overall though, Sylvia is just misunderstood by most people. She does have a good heart and means well. I don’t think she realises how hard and aggressive she often comes across and how many people she has sadly alienated as a result. She is my friend, though and I am proud to call her that.

        Liz was in a bad way for a long time in her late teens and early twenties – she went badly off the rails – but I think she is somewhat better these days. She fornicated a lot and became very egotistical. I saw her mistreat and alienate people. Rebekah was always the most levelheaded of the children.

        The biggest problem is that Sylvia spoiled them as children – they were allowed to do things we wouldn’t dream of, such as, to give one example of many, rummage through their mother’s handbag as teenagers without her permission and not even receiving the slightest rebuke from her for this kind of behaviour. Myself and other mothers were shocked by this kind of thing.

        The children were all attention- seekers and desperate for people to like them. They lacked self-esteem in my view, especially Liz and Phil.

        I do think it is a big mistake for Philippa Moore to have become a public figure. Some of her writing has shocked and disgusted me. She did have psychological problems in her childhood as she notes in her memoir, The Latte Years, and has always been mildly eccentric or “unique” as she herself readily admits. On the one hand, she is an attention-seeker and shameless self-publicist ( https://www.pressreader.com/australia/mercury-hobart-magazine/20160129/281852937591028 ) and, on the other, she is psychologically fragile. Her use of the media to promote herself and her book is demonstrative of this. Whenever her writing is criticised she is quick to play the victim card (https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/books/booksblog/2017/may/22/when-tweeters-attack-why-do-readers-send-authors-their-bad-reviews
        ) and denounce her critics as “trolls” and “bullies” even going on SBS television to discuss this ( https://www.sbs.com.au/topics/voices/culture/article/2017/08/01/how-stand-online-bullies
        ) yet she and Tom have been perpetrators of bullying themselves.

        Philippa was a very sweet girl when she was young but I have been disturbed by the changes in her since she moved back to Tasmania. None of the changes are for the better. She is a very selfish person now. I personally think Tom has been a bad influence in her though she was heading down a hedonistic and selfish path even before she met him according to her writings in the Latte Years.

        Her writings promoting divorce as a liberating experience seem more like an attempt at self- justification for the failure of her first marriage than anything else but I really don’t know what happened there as I have only read her side of things. Her public promotion of divorce and attacks on traditional gender roles ( https://mobile.twitter.com/philippa_moore/status/1227790502814085125 ) though subconsciously betray the selfishness inherent in her work. ( https://www.huffpost.com/entry/getting-divorced-in-my-20s-made-me-a-better-person_b_9360484) The Latte Years is all about SELF. Self-realisation, self indulgence, etc, trampling over societal norms along the way. I suspect part of her liberalism may also be her trying to ingratiate herself to the literati. ( https://books.google.com.au/books?id=Ic6EDwAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=latte+years+philippa&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwin3LX0kfPnAhXe_XMBHTIXAQoQ6AEIKDAA#v=onepage&q=latte%20years%20philippa&f=false )

        As well as promoting divorce, in her columns and on her award-winning blog she has constantly promoted a sordid lifestyle. For instance, there was her notorious column for Cosmopolitan magazine on “50 Shades of Grey exercises” ( https://bit.ly/389L9Kq ) and blog posts on immoral sex and other personal matters (before she married Tom). I had to stop reading her blog because I was so disgusted by it. In The Latte Years though she admits that there was an element of naivety here too as she did not anticipate her discussion of her sex life would be turned against her by other bloggers and trolls. Besides openly committing sexual sin and promoting her lifestyle choices to others, there was no sense of decorum in her blog posts that private lives should be kept private. Pure smut. 🙁

        She is now pursuing a feminist political activist line as well, embracing every Leftist/Woke cause imaginable ( https://www.ebrd.com/news/2014/new-ebrd-gender-video-premieres.html ) with her Tweets and Guardian/Huffpost writings. She is so woke that, on her current blog, she even acknowledges the traditional custodians of the land she is on! ( https://www.philippamoore.net ) Despite this, like many Leftists, she has never been to an Aboriginal settlement in her life and knows nothing if their real needs or the rorts of Aboriginal “industry” and the “stolen generation” fraud. Tom sees fit to pontificate about Aboriginal affairs on Twitter (‘”Anyone who climbs Uluru is showing a total lack of respect”‘) despite having lived in Australia for only three months(!) at that stage. Breathtaking arrogance that left me appalled, I am afraid. ( https://mobile.twitter.com/tomschoon/ )

        You have outline all of their other extremely woke views above. You point out the inconsistency of Phil being a fan of Hawke-Keating whilst she and Tom Schoone despise the Tories and Thatcherism. I don’t understand how they synthesise these views either since we all know Hawke-Keating ‘economic rationalism’ was just rebranded Thatcherism. Phil was also cheerleading for a Bill Shorten victory on Twitter, even though his would-be treasurer, Chris Bowen, had repeatedly stated in the media that he wanted to continue Keating’s disastrous reform policies. Making it all the stranger, in the Latte Years, Phil acknowledges that the disastrous Keating-exacerbated 1990s recession cost her family their home, forcing them to move to the countryside (Cygnet). Her parents are fairly-diehard Labor supporters though so she would undoubtedly be influenced by them.

        In terms of religion, I think her parents are very much nominal Catholics. I have never discussed such sensitive topics with them, though, so I am not certain of their beliefs. Her Dad, the 7HOFM radio announcer Richard Moore, did attend a Presbyterian-run school when he was in Africa for a stint as a child though. Phil herself attended a Catholic all- girls school (where she was extremely unhappy) and then the elite Friends Quaker School. By her own admission on her blog though, religion classes bored her and she was not particularly interested in the Bible, sadly although she is an intelligent person, a member of Mensa, top TCE student, studying for a doctorate, etc. Phil’s first marriage took place in an evangelical Anglican Church but I think she only picked this because her grandparents were married there. I believe she had to attend the Alpha Course before she was married and the minister whom I spoke to after the wedding seemed lovely but I think Phil only ever became a nominal Christian at best, if that. Certainly her views now, promoting divorce, homosexuality, a “woman’s right to choose” etc and experimenting with casual sex and masturbation between marriages are the antithesis of traditional Christianity. Philippa Moore has also dabbled in some occult practices including consulting a clairvoyant, hypnotherapy and practising yoga.

        Tom Schoon is openly atheist as well. Actually, Liz was tending to grow in religious conviction from her time working at Tasmanian Catholic kindergartens and preps. I don’t really know how firm her convictions are though. She needs a lot of prayer in her life as well so that she will grow in her faith. Please pray for her. It touches my heart deeply to see Liz grow in faith after the difficulties and mistakes and arrogance of her adolescence and twenties.

        Ultimately, I am struck by the sadness of the whole situation. Phil was a sweet but vulnerable and naive child who has through experiences grown into a rather unpleasant and selfish adult. She was always an emotionally fragile person who took things personally so I don’t know how many of the incidents in the Latte Years (school bullying, sexual harassment, internet trolls) were serious incidents in reality but they were clearly serious to her in her fragile state of mind. That and a sadly domineering, overprotective mother probably led to the eating disorders and other psychological problems. Philippa now sees release from her problematic childhood in a self-indulgent, hedonistic lifestyle with her second husband, Tom, of travel, fine food, alcohol and sensual indulgence, sexual experimentation, freedom from traditional gender constraints and a “liberating” divorce. She thought she could gain life experience and wisdom through smut in places like San Francisco and London. Unfortunately, she has found support for her views amongst her fellow Twitterati and in the Leftist media for which she writes. What really worries me though is what will she be left with when she finally realises how hollow her new lifestyle really is and it all falls through. Also, it saddens me deeply that she promotes such selfish living and rejection of Biblical norms through her columns, her book and her high-profile blog and Tweets. Although very intelligent, I don’t think she is very critically-minded: she just swallowed all of the feminist and gender politics twaddle she learnt at uni without questioning any of it. She does not see the agendas that lie behind these things. It is also sad to note she and Ton have been guilty of online bullying themselves, something they are quick to decry in others.

        I also continually worry about her mental health. Since Philippa Moore has been in such a fragile place mentally before, I don’t know if courting the media and trying to build up a high profile in literary circles and the public gaze is the best path for her. Also, although she is clearly happy with him, I don’t know if Tom is a good influence on her or if he is just dragging her in an even more extreme leftist, hedonistic position. I realise he has a mild mental illness but his whole uber-leftist lifestyle is doing her no favours.

        At heart though, I still want to believe that Philippa Moore is still the good kid I knew when she was young and that she has just gone down a bad path more through naivety than anything due to her sheltered upbringing and bad early experiences out in the world, a world she is still trying to make sense of. Though she promotes sin and destructive social behaviours and there is an air of self-entitlement to some of her writing, I don’t think she is in the same class as most uktra-woke Guardian/Huffpost guest contributor hacks. Being back in Tasmania away from London will be good for her, hopefully. I will therefore pray earnestly for her and Tom as you wish us to do and would strongly urge others to do so as well because I am really worried for that kid. She needs love and support, not condemnation, and desperately needs faith in her life. She is intelligent enough that she would listen to anyone willing to help guide her onto a better path for, despite her claims in her writings and her book that she has found herself, it is evident to me that she is still a very lost person. She would not listen to me but I hope someone she encounters will help give her guidance with her struggles and questions one day. It is a very slim chance but Phil, if you do ever read this, I know you are a very sensitive person so please don’t take offence at anything I have written above. Please know that people love you and are praying for you.

      2. Thanks for commenting on Philippa Moore and her book. I read ‘The Latte Years’ recently and, subsequently, some of her news opinion pieces and I was appalled by her anti-Christian attitudes to marriage, divorce and sex. Definitely not the kind of writings I would want my daughter to read.

        Honestly, the impression I got was that she is a spoilt, immature brat, albeit a very insecure one, and the comments above about her mother reinforce that view.

        I just looked at her Twitter account and I saw this recent Tweet, which seems to sum up her hostility towards Christianity:

        =====
        Droplet FireVanessa STAY AT HOME Tiger face Trophy
        ·
        Mar 28

        There’s no hate like Christian love.

        9
        15
        303

        Philippa Moore
        @philippa_moore
        Replying to
        @Miss_vee_bee

        Perfectly put.

        5:21 PM · Mar 28, 2020·Twitter for iPhone
        2
        Likes

        ====

        I wonder where her hatred came from? I don’t know whether to feel sorry for her or repulsed by her views. I will definitely pray as you suggest.

        There is so much self-entitlement and self-righteousness in her loony leftist articles.

        On another note, yes, I am so glad Scott Morrison is our Prime Minister in this pandemic situation! We certainly dodged a bullet with Labor’s election loss. The way Shorten used the Beaconsfield mining tragedy to build up his national profile, I hate to think how he would have exploited this crisis to further his ends if he were our national leader. Even more frightening would be if Paul Keating’s puppet Chris Bowen were treasurer given the way Paul Keating bungled his handling of the 1990s recession. Whatever their shortcomings (indecisiveness being they key one) Morrison and Frydenberg are doing a great job given the circumstances.

  5. Hi! I’m from Tassie and i knew Philippa Moore when we were young too so I can relate to this. Yes now she is a wordsmith/journo/academic she has drunk the political correctness/identity politics kool-aid completely. 🙁

    What I find most ludicrous is the way that Philippa played the victim card in that SBS interview on bullying linked above. In truth she was a bully herself when we were younger. As other people have noted the Moore family are fairly notorious around Hobart. Her mother, Sylvia, bullied children. Her nickname was the ‘Lioness’ because she was so defensive of her own children but bullied other peoples kids. We were all terrified of her when we were at school she was so overbearing and aggressive, determined to always get her own way. She was sort of like a stage mother but instead of pushing her kids to achieve she mollycoddled and spoilt them and overindulged them. I guess that is how they ended up neurotic, politically correct snowflakes.

    Liz Moore the sister (now Liz Graham, married to Gene Graham a triathlete and electrician) was a neurotic, bullying, rude person too. I thought Richard Moore the father, a minor celeb radio announcer, was okay until Liz Graham was given an ‘Apple for the Teacher’ prize (an Apple computer) in a competition by his radio station (7HOFM). It was blatant nepotism and minor corruption. No where did they declare she was the radio station presenter’s daughter when she won their comp. 🙁

    Anyway I read Philippa Moore’s book, Latte Years, and felt dirty after I read it with all the talk of immoral sex. It also had some bizarre claims like she thinks had been sexually propositioned by an older girl(!) at her all-girls Catholic school (she isn’t sure what happened now as she has had some weird hypnotherapy to repress the memory). Whatever happened the parents found the diary and confronted the school principal. However they then enrolled her three younger sisters in the he school. If something that bad had happened surely the parents would have pulled them all from that school?!

    On her Twitter page I saw this absolutely blasphemous birthday card from her parents:

    https://mobile.twitter.com/philippa_moore/status/1265189347969515522

    I understand it is some kind of meme from the TV show ‘Gavin & Stacey’ (I have never watched it) but surely Philippa Moore realises how offensive it would be to Christians to put in the public sphere on social media. Someone so concerned about political correctness and not offending others is unconcerned about the deep offence to people of faith. As usual there is breathtaking hypocrisy among the identity politics crowd.

    Philippa Moore retweeted this statement too so she endorses liberal authoritarian censorship for others but does not mind who she offends herself:

    https://mobile.twitter.com/mingzhuhii/status/1270874503275413504

    One of the most disturbing tweets of all though is this one. Philippa is using the Kew tragedy in which four police officers died to promote identity politics:

    https://mobile.twitter.com/philippa_moore/status/1253579537687822337

    To me, that is just gutter politics on Philippa Moore’s part and when I saw that I lost any and all respect i had for her.

    Philippa Moore also tweeted several times during the Geoffrey Rush case, assuming he was guilty and was furious when he was found innocent. She has also retweeted posts accusing Trump of sexual assault which claim that having credible witnesses is as good as being found guilty. Look, I know as well as the next person that the legal system is deeply flawed and even corrupt but here Philippa Moore is blatantly rejecting the presumption of innocence until proven guilty. It is another step towards Liberal Authoritarian tyranny.

    Anyone from Tasmania who has met Philippa Moore knows she is a mildly eccentric person. However the types of views held by her and the other members of the identity politics crowd are more than just eccentric: they are dangerous. Calling for censorship, rejecting the presumption of innocence, reverse racism in assuming white males are guilty, and various other statements she has made would logically lead to the undermining of democracy.

    Her soapboxing over COVID-19 shows a breathtaking naivety with regard to economics as do her comments on the so-called ‘Stolen Generations’ industry and indigenous affairs.

    Unlike most of the commenters on this site, I guess, I am a former Leftist. I actually had a lot of time for the Old Left with it’s focus on economic equality and social progress. They have now completely alienated me and I have lurched to the Right because of the New Left’s identity politics, bullying and espousal of authoritarianism. Philippa Moore is a typical representative of this new Left. How much she believes what she writes and how much of it is just her getting on trendy bandwagons like BLM, the Stolen Generations, etc, I cannot tell.

    1. London calling… London calling… Hello there!

      I recently read The Latte Years hoping it would provide answers to some questions I had. It didn’t really but perhaps, to be fair, I was too old for the book (which seems to be aimed at people in their late teens/early twenties). In fact, it really surprised me because some of the thought in it seemed so superficial. I was expecting something with a lot more insight and depth.

      I am not sure if Philippa Moore is a good writer or not because the other thing that annoyed me about the book is that it is written in an extremely colloquial, “chatty” style. I prefer more polished, formal prose.

      Anyway, I didn’t know what to make of the author at first. I’ve been reading through her Tweets linked above to get a better sense of her and I can see she is a crank.

      I have many Leftist political sympathies myself but her SJW pontificating about subjects she clearly knows nothing about is truly grating. Perhaps that comes from her father being a radio broadcaster as I gather from the discussion above.

      Her parroting of groupthink Identity Politics positions also makes her seem bereft of original thought. She just takes standard SJW Leftist ideas and drives them to bizarre extremes. Are these her real convictions? If not, is she promoting these views in an attempt to ingratiate herself with the literati? It shows the worrying poverty of thought on the Left of politics today.

      If they are her real convictions then, as I said above, she is a crank. I guess those with a loud-enough voice and a platform in the media are those who are most noticed these days, though.

      I also agree that the birthday card tweet is truly offensive. It gives more insight into Philippa Moore and her parents than her book does, in a way she has clearly not intended.

      Cheers. Thanks for reading.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

%d bloggers like this: