Every year at Easter I get more and more frustrated at Christian spokespeople who get on the media and then say so little – other than try to be nice and just reflect the values of the culture whilst proclaiming how radical Christianity is. There are great exceptions but increasingly I find that some ‘secular’ writers make more sense and are less bland and conformist than many clergy and Christian commentators. This year the best articles I have read have been James Mumford’s ‘Spiritual but not Religious’ in the Spectator and this from Kevin McKenna in The Herald – the full text below (republished with permission!).

Kevin McKenna: Christ’s life and death on a cross at Calvary challenges all of us
In this Covid Holy Week the suffering and death of Jesus have never felt more meaningful; nor have his choices. In the final weeks of his human life our saviour chose to be with prostitutes; drinkers and assorted social misfits: those whom society pushed to the outskirts of society. He seemed to have a special care for lepers.
His miracles weren’t Hollywood events, conducted on stages for maximum impact; they seemed to occur on whims born of human compassion: blind people; the disabled; those experiencing psychological trauma; widows in their grief being fleeced by the religious authorities. His flashes of anger are directed at privilege; the desecration of sacred places for profit; at the cruelty of laws which imprison rather than liberate.
His death was an execution staged and carried out by the powerful who had simply had enough after three years of being called out by Him. To do it they offered bribes; bent the law in their favour and then stirred mob fury by affecting false virtue.
Throughout history, the Catholic Church’s own boss class subliminally shifted the emphasis of these messages as they sought the financial support of temporal power structures. Less than a century before the most lethal pandemic in human history – the Black Death (1346-1353) – they were urging Europe’s richest men to annihilate Muslims in exchange for sellable indulgences… and called it a Holy War.
They took refuge in Christ’s oft-quoted but often misrepresented declaration: “The poor you will always have with you but you will not always have me.” But this was a rebuke too: “what do you care about the poor?”
In this Covid year the corporates have been mouthy that a more nuanced approach to lockdown hasn’t been adopted. What they mean by ‘nuanced’ is one that gives them dispensation to profiteer, secure that their personal resources will always provide protection.
Coronavirus has increased inequality but it didn’t cause it. It has merely exposed the social injustices that had been present for generations. We permit this to flourish because we make an accommodation with it after we feel we have achieved herd immunity from its effects.
Coronavirus reduced sophisticated, democratic government by the cleverest people in the world to rubble in a matter of weeks. As their systems and infrastructures collapsed the inequality these masked were exposed. It’s why, knowing that these governments are unable to protect them in the teeth of Covid 19, frail, vulnerable and elderly people will always seek comfort in the life of their saviour and the events that led to his own suffering and death. They feel close to him on that hill at Calvary.
This week, Scottish Government figures revealed that 12% of pensioners are in a state of “persistent poverty”. The Chief Executive of Age Scotland said: “It’s hugely frustrating that levels of pensioner poverty remain so high and there has been no real progress in reducing it.” During lockdown they were barred from the places that provided consolation.
This is not to condemn the government for illegally shutting churches. They did this not to be cruel or to discriminate but through a failure to understand. Those of us who trusted that they were simply following the science now know they’d been blinded by it. This was born of ignorance about what faith means to people. Faith embarrasses secular governments and makes them feel edgy and uncomfortable. It should, for it implies loyalty to an authority greater than anything that exists in the realm of civic control.
The tendency of some smart people to mock the religious faith of others has always puzzled me. In common usage we deploy an entire glossary of words and idioms that indicate design and planning: patterns of human behaviour; the diurnal changing of the seasons, the precision engineering of all living and breathing creatures; the certainty of nature that provides the foundations of civilisations and industries.
Yet, in the face of so much that has clearly been designed and landscaped, they cling to the randomness of our existence; that it was a mere happy accident. That this might hint at a plan and the big possibility that lies behind this – a planner – cannot ever be contemplated. This is not to argue for the existence of God; merely a reflection on why belief in this existence at least deserves some accommodation.
Perhaps, though, Christians are too pre-disposed to adopting victim status; to interpret the fury of the mob as a personal slight. We cite the extermination of Christians throughout the world and nurse a silent rage that expresses itself in the abjuration: “They wouldn’t treat us like that if we were Jews/Muslims/Hindus.”
Well, perhaps. But when you belong to a church whose own authorities gladly participated in the invasion and sacking of the lands and property of Jews, Muslims and Hindus and turned a blind eye to the sporadic attempts to exterminate them then perhaps you need to take it on the chin.
Yet, even to talk of faith you feel required first to validate your right to do so. It’s fashionable in Scotland right now not merely to dismiss religious faith but to do so with malice. When a person in public life expresses support for an idea associated with faith they must first assure their followers that, of course, they don’t actually believe any of this jiggery-pokery. For that would be to invite ridicule in enlightened, progressive Scotland.
The message of Christ’s death and resurrection should evoke profoundly emotional reactions in the hearts and minds of all who hear it, believer and non-believer alike. You can’t simply shrug off this sort of stuff; not when it presents a direct challenge to your way of life; your narcissism; your arrogance of intellect; your banal certainty that you are the master of your own destiny and your own salvation.
And that your salvation might lie in self-sacrifice and belonging to something bigger. And that you might be required to retreat and reduce so that something more vital may flourish … true peace; true justice; true equality.
I don’t necessarily agree with all that Kevin says but his challenge to our anti-Christian culture is spot on. His emphasis on the failure of governments, design pointing to a designer, the historical failures of some who profess Christianity, the irrationality hostility to Christianity within civic Scotland, and the challenge of the Resurrection is greatly appreciated. I tweeted this week that I thank God for the Spectator – their cover this week is brilliant. And received the usual attacks. Well I also thank God for Kevin McKenna, an intelligent, thoughtful and truly radical writer – would that we had more like him. Happy Easter!
PS. Have you heard the Easter Quantum yet? Quantum 140 – Foucault, Fletcher and Chariots of Fire – the Easter Episdode
Couldn’t agree more David – we’re singing out the same Easter hymn book and reading the same newspaper and magazine articles. Like yourself I rejoiced in the Spectator cover and article and also “enjoyed” reading Kevin McKenna’s column in the Herald. Even when I disagree with him I always admire his relentless pursuit of social justice and his preparedness to challenge the woke orthodoxy which infects every area of Scottish life. It was also a bonus to have a Peter Howson painting featured. I’m preaching at Perth, Scotland on Easter Sunday and plan to close by showing a painting by Peter Howson – Christos Aneste : Christ has Risen which was translated as a 20×10 ft billboard in Prestwick on Easter 2004. I photographed it and tomorrow I plan to superimpose Studdert Kennedy’s poem Indifference on the images on PowerPoint –
When Jesus came to Golgotha they hanged him on a tree, They drove great nails through hands and feet, and made a Calvary. They crowned him with a crown of thorns, red were his wounds and deep, For those were crude and cruel days, and human flesh was cheap.
When Jesus came to Prestwick Toll they simply passed him by, They never hurt a hair of him, they only let him die; For men have grown more tender, and they would not give him pain, They only just passed down the street, and left him in the rain.
Still Jesus cried, “Forgive them, for they know not what they do!” And still it rained the winter rain that drenched him through and through; The crowd went home and left the streets without a soul to see, And Jesus crouched against a wall and cried for Calvary.
Did you have a chance to see the Bruderhof Christians on Compass on the ABC this morning, Pastor? Very inspirational.
Unfortunately, tonight’s episode is going to be about a stonemason who carved the statues/idols – at $50 000 a piece – for the Brisbane Anglican Cathedral and Catt will be on.
“Faith embarrasses secular governments and makes them feel edgy and uncomfortable.”
Well, yes and the same is true for every individual. Faith shows us our pretences and inclination towards narcissism wiht our our self-reliance on our individual claim of being an “independent” person. The truth is that we cannot meet our needs of our own volition. And it also offers hope in our needs being met where we otherwise would fall into despair through our self-reliance not meeting them.
It also does for religious powers what it does for secular governments. It wasn’t the secular that appealed to Pilate for Jesus for face a death penalty but religious leaders!
Faith afflicts the comfortable and comforts the afflicted. So yes, whether it is the turning of the other cheek, the going of the extra mile etc or the use of legal rights to appeal for justice, loving never fails, and truth is freeing.
And yes, with anyone either knowingly or in ignorance being oppressive with the power they have (which they only have because God allows it) it makes them feel uncomfortable and experience shame.
It’s why it is so powerful, to the extent that it cost Jesus his life. But all of that happened in God’s will, such that death be defeated – death where is thy sting!
Happy Easter David :).
@ Geoff
Like all faith-based belief systems, while most adherents and practices are relatively harmless and their practices and ceremonies little more than for show they regularly include the fanatics and the nutters.
So what you call embarrassment is, in reality, authorities maintaining a healthy watching brief – just in case.
When one considers what certain individuals/groups have shown themselves to be capable of in the name of their religion I think we should all be grateful for the ”Watchers”, don’t you, Geoff?
Apologies, Adam. I addressed this comment to Geoff by mistake. Perhaps David will be kind enough to amend?
On our way home after our Good Friday service BBC Radio 4 news reported the Archbishop of Wales saying, that we all need to create our own resurrection!
Never mind it being out of historical, scripture sequence, it was Creedally abhorrent.
What is more it was repeated today, Resurrection Day, on Premier Radio.
Maybe, it is a condemnation, a curse of humanity, to a pointless heavy weight, ever failing, Sysiphean resurrection, he is referring to. Gut wrenching, facile horror.