Creflo Dollar and the Corporate Charismatics

 13394016_10154346219604430_1307395707687074880_n

Its been six months since I wrote about Creflo Dollar not being welcome in Scotland – an article which is still being read by hundreds every week.  https://theweeflea.com/2016/04/12/why-creflo-dollar-is-not-welcome-in-scotland/

There have been many questions asked since this event so its time to get a longer term view. What happened? What was the effect? Am I still opposed? If so why?

What happened?

He came, he saw…he went away.  Apparently he had a ‘significant word to impart’. This was a weekend, which was ‘without doubt to be nation changing’. There were a ‘number of decisions’ (68 in Glasgow), some people loved it, others did not, and the journalist said it was a great show.   The promise that it was ‘nation changing’ was not fulfilled.   All in all it was a bit of damp squib.

The visit caused dissension within the church in Scotland. There is no doubt that this is the case. I got it in the neck because I stated publicly what many people said privately. The Matthew 18 card was constantly played and I was told that I should have contacted Creflo and expressed my concerns to him first. When I suggested that this would be a waste of time I was told, how do you know?  Have you tried?  So I did. I wrote Creflo through a couple of different channels. Guess what? It was a waste of time. He had no concern for me. Or should I say, his corporation and his people had no concern. And I don’t believe they have any concern for the church in Scotland or the cause of the Gospel here. It was just another gig for the corporation.   They didn’t respond and astonishingly the leadership in Destiny, having told me to contact him, then praised Creflo for NOT responding to the criticism about him – portraying this as some kind of wise humility. I call it arrogant disdain.

There were many Christians, including some in Destiny who were distressed by Creflo Dollar flying in to deliver his message.   As regards the latter I know that there are people who left Destiny over this. Despite being told that there was only one disgruntled former Destiny member who was unhappy my postbag declared otherwise. The following is typical of some of the responses I received – “I wanted to write to you and thank you for your stance regarding the visit of Creflo Dollar. I attended a Destiny campus until fairly recently and the decision to invite the appropriately named Mr Dollar was part of my reasoning for leaving.”

Why am I Still Opposed?

Whilst I still think that his $27 million plus wealth, plus Rolls Royce and private jet, in an area where the average salary is $29,640, is sinful, the biggest problem is the theology that justifies and fuels this greed. It is a poison that does a great deal of harm.

“Jesus bled and died for us so that we can lay claim to the promise of financial prosperity.” (Tweet from Creflo Dollar).

 

Let me deal with one excuse which was made for this. ‘Yes Creflo has a lot of money – you should see what he does with it’ (apart from buying a private jet). He helps orphans. I’m sorry to be cynical but I know this game too well. If you want to raise money its one of the easiest tricks in the world to have a ‘child sponsorship’ scheme from which you then deduct ‘administrative’ expenses (in one case I know of – 70%!) which fund your organization. It’s a win/win for your charity/corporation. You get to pose with starving kids who you are helping (after flying in on your private jet) and your ministry also gets funded (thus enabling you to pay for the private jet).

And then this horrendous video from one of his sermons. The transcript is below.

 

Now, you know, we’re under the Blood of Jesus, so we can’t shoot and stone people like we used to. All we have to do is repent and God will forgive us and take us where we need to be. But I can tell you, man, if it wasn’t for the Blood, there’d be a whole lot of us being stoned and being in Hell right now over the tithe. But for [“if not for”?] the Blood of Jesus, we’d be doomed.

 I mean, I thought about when we first built “The Dome,” I wanted to put some of those little moving bars and give everybody a little card. They’d stick it in a little computer slot. If they were tithing, beautiful music would go off and, you know, [Creflo sings] “Welcome, welcome, welcome to the World Dome.” [Congregation laughs.]

 But…if they were non-tithers, the bar would lock up, the red and blue lights would start going, the siren would go off, and a voice would go out throughout the entire dome, “Crook, crook, crook, crook!” [Congregation laughs.] Security would go and apprehend them, and once we got them all together, we’d line them up in the front and pass out Uzis by the ushers and point our Uzis right at all those non-tithing members ’cause we want God to come to church, and at the count of three “Jesus”-es we’d shoot them all dead. And then we’d take them out the side door there, have a big hole, bury them, and then go ahead and have church and have the anointing. [Mostly silence in the congregation, but one or two still actually laugh.]

 Aren’t you glad we’re under the Blood of Jesus? [“Yeah, yeah,” from the congregation.] Because if we were not under the Blood of Jesus, I would certainly try it.

 His sermon was entitled ‘nothing or no-one is going to stop me preaching this gospel of grace” 2 Timothy 2:15. This is the gospel of grace? If it wasn’t for the blood of Jesus I would kill you all if you didn’t tithe to my church?

Contrast the money grabbing greed of Creflo Dollar with this from John Piper –

Why bother to raise this again?

Because I am concerned for the glory and honour of Jesus Christ. The notion that this type of teaching and practice is done in his name, and defended and promoted by some of his people in Scotland, is deeply distressing. Not only am I concerned about evangelism (‘the Lords name is blasphemed amongst the Gentiles because of you’) but I am also concerned about the Lord’s people being misled.   I was recently reading in Revelation 2 about the church in Sardis, which was a great church and yet Jesus had something against them – they tolerated ‘that woman Jezebel who calls herself a prophet. By her teaching she misleads my servants into sexual immorality and the eating of food sacrificed to idols”. What struck me about that was that it was the Lord’s servants (not the devil’s) who were being misled. That can happen – and that is what I think is happening with Creflo Dollar.

I am concerned about church leadership in Scotland. On the one hand we face the dangers of those who would deny the teaching of the Scriptures by taking away from them (the liberals); on the other by those who add to them -the legalists and what I call the corporate charismatics. I have written many times before about the first two but I think it’s now time to say something about the latter.

What are the corporate charismatics? They are those who believe in the gifts of the Spirit being exercised today (nothing wrong with that) but who have a corporate model of church. They are concerned about numbers and figures. What percentage increase do they see? How much money is coming in? How many ‘decisions’?   By those criteria the apostle Paul was a disaster and Jesus was a terrible preacher! They combine Latte Christianity with an entertainment culture, moralistic therapeutic deism and a corporate style church with a rigid hierarchical leadership.   Coming to a city/town near you soon….

I am not anti-charismatic. I am not a cessasionist. How could I be? I believe that the Holy Spirit is sovereign and He distributes his gifts as He wills. I’m not going to tell Him what he can and cannot do!   I love many charismatics and charismatic/Pentecostal churches. It’s been wonderful to have so many charismatics in St Peters. I think there is a lot we can learn from charismatic churches. But there are also questions that need to be asked.

Why are there so many charismatic causalities? Why so many walking wounded?   A major reason is that there is a real tendency towards an unbiblical authoritarian leadership. I think one of the main reasons this occurs is that when you replace the authority of the Word of God with the authority of the self-styled prophet/pastor then it is very easy to end up with spiritual abuse (the same occurs in ‘liberal’ and legalistic churches).  I remember listening to one charismatic church leader give a sermon in which he declared somewhat glibly that those who had committed adultery would be forgiven, but he then spent 25 minutes telling the congregation that if they committed the terrible sin of disagreeing with the anointed leadership of the congregation, the consequences would be terrible! It seemed as though disobeying the Word of the Lord was a minor infraction compared with disobeying the word of the pastor.

One charismatic who was coming to St Peters suddenly stopped. After a few weeks I contacted him to see if he was ok. He told me why he had stopped. He loved coming to the church but when I was preaching through the book of Revelation he found that he did not agree with something that was being said. I told him that it did not matter, that many people probably thought the same, and that it as a difficult passage to exegete and I could have got it wrong. But it was no reason for him to stay away. He was shocked. “You mean I don’t have to agree with you? I thought I had to be under the authority of the leadership and submit to it”. I told him that whilst in one sense that was true – it was not an absolute authority and that the Word of God must always be first. It’s ok to disagree. But when the Word of God is sidelined (whether in liberal or charismatic churches) then the leadership of the Church becomes THE authority.

I was reminded of that in listening to Creflo and how the Destiny leadership handled it. Whilst I appreciated a lot of what was said and found some to be gracious and gentle, I really did not appreciate the passive/aggressive and the aggressive/aggressive approach sometimes taken.

First and understandably the Destiny leadership wanted to portray themselves as innocent victims facing up to ungodly opposition from within the church. ‘People are jealous….they are determined to stand in your way…they just don’t want you to succeed. “  It’s a ridiculous charge.  My opposition to Creflo does not come from some desire to prevent Destiny succeeding.  Precisely the opposite.  I want them to be a growing and thriving Gospel church – not one built upon the heresy of the Prosperity ‘gospel’, which is really no gospel at all!

The people attending the Creflo Dollar rally were told:   “I just want to first say thank you to you as a church. You stood with us over these last few weeks, and these last few months, despite all that’s been said and all that’s been happening and you carried the good grace, with faith, refused to retaliate, prayed for those who said some things,” he said. “This is your moment,” he continued. “ (Report of the Dollar meeting in Glasgow in The National).

I find it interesting that my honest opposition on biblical grounds was portrayed as some kind of spiritual assault upon the Godly.   As for the refusing to retaliate? I wish!

I was told by the Destiny leadership at a meeting on the 26th of April that they did not criticise people publicly and that this was a dreadful thing to do.   The Matthew 18 card was played and the Destiny leadership declared that they talked to people not about them. And yet…..

Don’t Touch the Lord’s Anointed!

I was sent a copy of a sermon preached the previous week on April the 17th and another of a leadership meeting in which I was the subject of named and direct criticism. This is a very strange way to talk to people rather than about them! Anyone listening to these two talks would clearly have the impression that I was at best misguided and at worst someone who did not respect the anointed of the Lord and would face the consequences.

This ‘don’t touch the Lord’s anointed (by implication ‘us’) is a card that was played against me as a very young Christian. As a newly converted teenager I was returning from hitchhiking in Europe when I went with my unconverted friend to what turned out to be a charismatic house meeting in central London.   It was babble. It got so bad, and I was so young and naïve, that I thought anyone could stand up and speak – so I did. Reading from the Sermon on the Mount – ‘and when you pray do not keep babbling like pagans!’ The stunned silence that followed ended with yours truly being surrounded by a squad of people who laid hands on me and prophesied that this thorn would turn into a rose. The next day the leader asked to meet with me and told me that I had blasphemed against the Holy Spirit. It cost me two years of doubt and misery.

I had that same feeling again this time. What if you are wrong? What if Creflo is the Lord’s anointed etc.? Thankfully the Lord answered my cries very quickly when I turned on my computer and lo and behold up came a talk from Creflo – which was pure heresy. Thank you Lord.

But the sermon on April the 17th was dreadful. It mentioned me by name before going on to give a series of stories about the consequences for those who go against the Lord’s anointed. The car salesman whose business was burned, the man in India who died after a theft etc.  It was an explicit as well as an implicit threat. What astounded me even more was that this sermon was preached before myself and David Meredith met with the Destiny leaders. I regard it as hypocritical to sit and say you don’t criticize other Christian leaders in public a week after you have just preached a sermon implicitly warning they are going to be divinely punished if they dare criticize Creflo Dollar!   The leader concerned was contacted in private several months ago and asked to apologise. So far, not a word.

Spiritual Abuse?

I’m afraid this is the kind of spiritual abuse and authoritarianism that some in some charismatic churches have to face. If you begin to question the hyperbole, money and success focus, the questionable theology and practices, and you will soon find that you are ‘in rebellion’ against the Lord’s anointed.   There are coded and not so coded warnings. For young and sensitive Christians it can be a powerful means of control.  Especially when it is good people, whom you love and who have done you a great deal of good. It can be a faith shattering experience.

It is a form of spiritual manipulation – as was the attempt to silence me by saying that several ‘Free Church ministers’ had told them they did not agree with me. That may be true – (although not exactly fulfilling the Matthew 18 criteria so beloved of those who seek to silence criticism, as none of my brothers spoke to me about it), but the bad news is for those who seek to control in this way, I don’t care. If my criteria for speaking was whether Free Church ministers agreed with me or not, I would be silent forever!

Gospel-Plus and Grace

Another real problem is that the Corporate Charismatics promise a Gospel-plus and then justify it by a false application of the doctrine of grace. Take for example this reason given for coming to Creflo’s show.

6- You will be SO encouraged with Creflo’s ministry, as he unpacks dimensions of the gospel, that most people have never heard. Religion hates grace and fights it tooth and nail, grace responds with overwhelming love and leads you into another dimension of life as God intended.

 ‘Dimensions of the Gospel that most people have never heard’! That should set the alarm bells going straight away. I’m not sure I would be inviting someone to preach ‘dimensions of the gospel’ that my congregation have not heard!  If your people have not heard ‘dimensions of the Gospel’ from you and you then have to import an American multi-millionaire evangelist to teach them – there is something wrong!   It is true that Creflo ‘unpacks’ ‘dimensions of the gospel that most people have never heard’, but that is because they are not dimensions of the gospel – they are distortions of the gospel, rather than the hidden gnostic parts of it, which only he can unpack.

But again note the controlling aspect and manipulation. Using truth to manipulate people into your own point of view. It is true that religion hates grace (although surely not the religion that James speaks about? -James 1:27), but is Creflo Dollar preaching grace? Grace is meaningless without Christ. I don’t think Creflo Dollar preaches the grace of Christ – I think he misuses it as a way to manipulate, boost his corporate ministry and obtain wealth for himself.

One of the most important books that any Christian leader could read today is The Whole Christ by Sinclair Ferguson – https://theweeflea.com/2016/03/29/the-whole-christ-the-best-theological-book-in-400-plus-years/ He sums up the grace thing superbly.

At one level the problem is indeed rejection of God’s law. But underneath lies a failure to understand grace and ultimately to understand God. True, his love for me is not based on my qualification or my preparation. But it is misleading to say that God accepts us the way we are. Rather he accepts us despite the way we are. He receives us only in Christ and for Christ’s sake. Nor does he mean to leave us the way he found us, but to transform us into the likeness of his son.

Grace does not mean we just accept what people do. It means we accept people despite what they do and seek that all would be transformed into the likeness of his son.

I have no desire to diss Destiny. I want them to grow, prosper and flourish – because Scotland needs more dynamic and growing churches. And that’s why I hope that instead of diverting people into the misleading teaching and corporate greed of Creflo Dollar, they will repent, disown their association with Creflo Dollar, and get on with the real work of the Gospel that God has called them to do. And I pray that the Lord will give me the strength to do the same.

https://theweeflea.com/2016/04/14/creflo-dollar-and-scotland-the-reaction/

https://theweeflea.com/2016/04/15/the-destinydollar-fall-out-continues/

https://theweeflea.com/2016/04/20/why-i-believe-in-the-gospel-of-prosperity/

https://theweeflea.com/2016/04/30/an-open-letter-to-creflo-dollar/

 

 


16 thoughts on “Creflo Dollar and the Corporate Charismatics

  1. I can relate to your experiences regarding the Charismatic church, especially the comments regarding the walking wounded and the authority sentiments expressed within it. Its still something I’m hugely troubled by but I’m glad people like yourself are speaking out on this. For me I struggle to see how the Charismatic movement can be redeemed from the likes of Mr Dollar. I’m not a Cessationist but to be honest I wouldn’t be sad to see the contemporary Charismatic movement wither over time. Wherever it goes it seems to generate more heat than light. I don’t doubt people can take a lot from it but it seems so frequently to squeeze out the Grace of Jesus Christ (or replace it with some ‘new thing’ being done that looks nothing like the Kingdom of God) in exchange for spectacles and earthly security.

  2. ““In tithes and offerings. You are under a curse—your whole nation—because you are robbing me. Bring the whole tithe into the storehouse, that there may be food in my house. Test me in this,” says the Lord Almighty, “and see if I will not throw open the floodgates of heaven and pour out so much blessing that there will not be room enough to store it.” Mal 3:8-10

    OK “the storehouse” being the church – a teaching that is going on in some churches here with talk of it being the only place God says to test him to see the blessings he will pour out as a result. I know, I’ve been in one. OK – I did “submit to authority” on this but it wasn’t the deal breaker for me. It was being told I have a “prophetic anointing” and then later not being listened to.

    I decided to leave and on the last day there as I was saying goodbye to people someone came to me and said she had a vision for me. It was of an acorn. The acorn was the emblem of the apprentice squadron I joined in the Royal Air Force. The motto of the squadron was “Non Plerique Delicaturi” which in Latin means “few are chosen. So, unknown to her, I have an association of honour with an acorn.

    So what have I learned? To give what I have decided in my heart to give for God loves a cheerful giver and that it shouldn’t be given under compulsion. Also to weigh up prophecies and “words of knowledge” for myself and not let what I believe be determined either by my own pride or that of any leader but only that which by discernment is revealed by God and stands with scripture.

    You are right – there can be faith shattering experiences. It’s a difficult thing to be moving on from a church and the loss of relationships that have been built up over years which inevitably happen when you question church leaders.

    Spiritual pride can consume the best of people.

  3. I have to say that his visit to Aberdeen passed with scarcely a ripple, and I think that your original posts may well have contributed to this, for which we have to thank you. Your follow-up article is very timely and I hope will be as widely read as your original posts.

    As a pastor of two charismatic churches (now retired), but from a solid Biblically based, but cessasionist, Baptist background, I have experience of both the deadness of the letter of the law and the joy of the liberty of the Spirit. However, I am well aware of all the potential abuses of authority and manipulation. I do not think the answer is to wish for the demise of the charismatic church, but to allow openness to the Holy Spirit to function within the context of the authority of the Word of God as the final standard by which we evaluate that which purports to be from the Spirit. Grace (and grace gifts) must operate hand-in-hand with truth. Church leaders, of whichever tradition, also need to remember they are not to lord it over the flock, but to serve it in the same spirit of Christ Jesus himself, and to be willing to be held accountable. Philippians 2:1-5 should be our guide.

  4. ‘Tis with a heavy heart that I read and comment on this, but not because I disagree with what you have said and reported on, some of it, especially with respect to enforced cult-like tithing being in direct contrast and in opposition to the work of Holy Spirit in a Christian’s life. I don’t intend to watch/listen to any of your links to Dollar

    For a balanced and biblical overview of tithing from a non cessationist, charismatic Christian here is a link to Sam Storms post, three days ago.

    http://www.samstorms.com/enjoying-god-blog/post/10-things-you-should-know-about-tithing-under-the-mosaic-covena

    It does not take a prophetic gift, nor a word of knowledge to have foreseen the response or lack of it: entirely foreseeable, predictable.

    Spiritual abuse comes from Manipulation, Domination and Control and Intimidation, which was manifest in the “heavy shepherding” , “movement” in 1980’s.

    And the sermon of the 17 April seems to contain an implied threat, or worse a curse, neither of which would flow from the gospel of Jesus Christ or a brother in Christ.

    No, the heavy heart comes from the writing of a response with parts which seem to contain a self defence aspect, as it is a is a one I’m all too familiar with in myself. You’ll not get an apology

    I know you know and this is not meant to be patronising in any way:you are justified and safe in Christ, who is your refuge.

    Dollar, along with others, seem to have some influence with Trump, so again, that will reinforce his sense of anointing, and even less likely to be swayed by your blog.

    But as Keith demonstrates, there are those who are gratified by your speaking out. I am a non cessationist too, so to tar all with the same brush would be wrong, and I know you are not doing that, but not everyone will be able to draw a distinction.

    But it is worth remembering that in previous posts you’ve highlighted domination and control in large evangelical churches of the reformed and of the liberal persuasion, who also do not respond (at least openly).

    May He shine His face upon you and give you His peace.

  5. Thanks for your work here David. As someone who has had experience of the Destiny culture, the term ‘corporate charismatic’ applied to these types of church is pretty apt. Asking awkward questions about everything from theology to leadership to finance is a ‘no-no’. Perhaps its time for such organisations to be put under the microscope by the appropriate authorities. After all, those who have nothing to hide, have nothing to fear.

  6. ‘On the money’ (pardon the pun) once again, David. ‘Corporate charismatic’ is a perceptive phrase. That is exactly what Destiny, and many other charismatic churches have become. Long gone are the early days of house churches, cafes, and church halls — the whole thing has become a corporation with each church developing its own CEOs, brands, music, and merchandise. Your point about the disingenuous approach to ethics is spot on too. There is an ethical crisis in those contexts, integrity is often completely lacking. I could go on, but I won’t.

  7. 1+1 = 2. And 2 +2 = 4. Easy to understand would you not say ? Perhaps our dear brothers and sisters caught up in word faith theology need a gentle reminder of 1+1 does not = 2 in this Creflo you tube video.
    If you think the shenanigans and demonic activity going on in this Creflo you tube clip has anything to do with the glorious and magnificent person and teachings of Jesus Christ, may I suggest you are at emnity with God as you follow another Jesus. You may also need to come to a knowledge of God through the face of the real glorious and powerful Jesus Christ and not the word faith version Jesus, that you have created in your own mind.

  8. I followed the link from Geoff Graham to the article by Sam Storm. Well worth a read. It is not only our American brothers who have a tendency to stry back into the old covenant, but in relation to tithing they do seem to have made an art form of it. The tendency, and it is not Just Mr. Dollar, of seeing the tithe as only of money is a particular example of Old Covenant application, perhaps excused by our urban lifestyle without too many cattle or doves of which to tithe. Storm does recommend tithing on a freewill voluntary basis, not by way of obligation, as a way of honouring an OT principle. Another OT principle or at least an example which challenges me, is David’s statement – “shall I give to the Lord that which costs me nothing?” (sorry about the AV quote – some things stick in the mind). Giving to the Lord and His work, including but not limited to our local Church, is not so much an obligation as a privilege, but it should hurt a bit.

  9. Thanks, David for drawing back the curtain. It is curious how the Tithe is one of the few Old Testament ordinances that charismatic churches allow to transit to the New Testament era .. I wonder why!

    The prosperity gospel is a product of a prosperous age. The more money is swirling around, the more likely it is to be found. I wonder how much Creflo Dollar extracted from all the Scottish churches? I remember the recent demise of Clan Gathering and how that was mainly due to the high cost of importing such big speakers and their teams into St Andrews. I always thought the Royal and Ancient was a big inducement for them to come over!

    BTW, Creflo’s surname is most appropriate!

  10. One disgruntled ex-member? Far more than one and disgruntled is far to mild a word. Some of the former members are positively traumatised. It’s a testimony to the grace and love of Christmas that they have any faith.

  11. One of the things you maybe haven’t picked up on is that Destiny churches are effectively franchises. If you pay to attend their college you may get the opportunity to set up your own branch which will then provide you with a “living”. This is one reason why they have the ability to multiply like this. I believe that in India, taking part in their leadership training courses gives you the right to set up a congregation which explains why they have so many congregations in India.

    One question I have often wondered is where do all of their Scottish converts go? They clearly don’t stay within the Destiny churches as their membership is not growing by as much as the number of apparent conversions. They are not joining evangelical congregations of the Church of Scotland either as those churches new members by profession of faith figures are quite low (requires lots of digging through Blue Book appendices to see this). They don’t appear to be joining the Baptists either. Maybe they are all in the Free Kirk or the Episcopal Church?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s