Islam Online Articles Politics Uncategorized

Please Stop Talking! Ten things we shouldn’t say about the Paris massacres.

Here is my latest Christian today article –  Christian Today – Please Stop Talking   I have a sneaking suspicion that not everyone will agree with every point!  Good to hear your point of view – are you as fed up of the endless talking?  And is this article a self-contradiction?

In the aftermath of the Paris massacres, I was asked to comment. I didn’t and couldn’t. Indeed, watching the endless ‘live news’, I was struck by how completely pointless it all felt. Lots of people had died as a result of a coordinated Islamist terrorist attack. All I felt was horror and sorrow. Why would anyone need to know what I felt, given that most right thinking people would surely feel the same? What was the point of the endless news reports? The press releases from all and sundry? Did we need the voyeurism to bring home the horror of the events? Did we need the endless analysis and introspection? Did we need politicians telling us we are at war while simultaneously declaring “never again”? Did we need the interminable Internet arguments about changing your profile picture to a French flag, or asking why we did not recognise the equally horrific deaths in Beirut and Baghdad? I really had nothing to add. Social media was at its worst – infantile, shallow, voyeuristic, and conspiracy theorist abounding. I switched off after five minutes and just prayed.

Anyway, after reflection here are the ten things I wish people wouldn’t say after the next Islamist terrorist attack.

1. It’s all the fault of Islam. If only life were that simple! There are many factors involved in these attacks, of which Islam is only one. The majority of Muslims deplore the violence, not least because many are themselves the victims of such terrorism. Playing the Islamaphobia card ironically only plays into the hands of the extremists.

2. Islam is a religion of peace. Every leading politician will say this, but I suspect very few of them actually believe it. Reporters will tell us that the ISIS are “a million miles away from mainstream Islam” – as one BBC reporter helpfully informed the world. Really? Have they read the Koran? Do they know anything about Islamic theology or history, or are they just engaging in wishful Western liberal thinking? This is the way we would like things to be, so this is the way they must be. Islam does not mean peace. It means submission. And if you don’t submit to the will of Allah as expressed by Mohammed in the Koran, then there is no hope for you. Islam is also not just a religion, it is a political system. There is no church/state divide in Islam. I just simply ask if Islam is the religion of peace and tolerance, can you name one Islamic state where people are free to leave Islam and join another religion? Maybe people should read the Koran or study the life of Mohammed (and contrast it with Christ) before they use the “Islam is a religion of peace” line.

3. It’s all the fault of religion.One leading atheist tweeted “You can’t decry the attacks of Islamists and pray for Paris at the same time. Two sides of the same coin”. Forget the illogicality of the statement; what was disturbing about this was the crass attempt to use this tragedy to promote the anti-religious secularist agenda. As well as seeking to crudely lump all religions together in a twisted version of equality (they are all equally bad and irrational), the blood had hardly dried on the pavements before secular organisations were issuing statements about how secularism was the answer – neatly forgetting that France is supposed to be the ideal secular state. It is doubtful whether atheistic secularism has any answer for Islam.

4. This is an attack on universal human values. President Obama expressed it in his usual eloquent manner: “This is an attack not just on Paris, it is an attack not just on the people of France, but it is an attack on all of humanity and the universal values we share.” It’s very nice. But it is demonstrably false, because of two questions. First, what values are we talking about? Liberty? Equality? Fraternity? Do all of humanity share these values? Do the Muslim world? If you are a young unemployed Muslim Algerian living in a Banlieue in Paris, I wonder how ‘equal’ you feel? And secondly, if all of humanity shares these values, does that mean that those who do not are not human? Classifying your enemy as non-human and identifying your own values as the only truly human ones is for me a radical and chilling step.

5. It’s not God’s fault. I just don’t understand why after every tragedy, some Christians feel the need to apologise for God. Who are we talking to? The people who don’t believe in God in the first place? Ourselves? Instead of speaking for God, would it not be better to listen to Him? His word tells us plenty about His character and how in the past, His people have reacted to disaster. I recommend beginning with the Psalms.
6. Let’s bomb the xxxx out of them. Some politicians want to do that. President Hollande announced that we are at war; I thought we were already – French planes have been bombing ISIS for months. I’m not sure that retaliatory bombing will result in anything other than more bombs on European soil. Whether it works or not, Christians should not be exulting in bombs being dropped and people being killed. Ironically The Sun ran a headline the day after the attacks which read “Jihad it coming”, rejoicing in the death of so-called Jihadi John. The editorial declared, “We richly celebrate his assassination and hope more follow”. Donald Trump announced that we should “bomb the xxxx out of ISIS”. I am not surprised by Trump or the shouts of approval that greeted him, but I am disgusted that his words have been quoted approvingly in some churches. It is embarrassing when a pastor declares that “bombing the xxxx out of them is a biblical response”, and the congregation give a standing ovation.

7. We are all Parisians. No we are not. Some are, and some of us have good friends in Paris. Many of us have visited, and feel this attack a lot more than when they occur in places further afield. I can understand, because I share it, the feeling that somehow the killings in France are more horrific, because they are more like ‘us’. But we do need a wider perspective on how many people have died in the world from violence, including the 43 who died on Thursday in Beirut. We can and should empathise with Paris, but Christians have a more important identity than being European; we have brothers and sisters in Christ in every land.

8. Let’s all hold hands and sing Imagine. Coldplay at their concert in LA held a minute’s silence and then sang John Lennon’s Imagine. A video of a pianist playing Imagine at the scene of the crime went viral. “Imagine no religion”, we sing, as though religion were the sole cause of violence and terrorism. Strangely no-one seems to think of the hypocrisy of the wealthy singing about imagining “no possessions too”. If religion was taken away, I have a sneaking suspicion that people would still have plenty “to kill or die for”. Singing Imagine may make one somewhat smug, as though ‘we’ have the answers and ‘they’ are the problem.

9. Keep the refugees out. The conspiracy theorists are having a field day. They tell us that ISIS are invading Europe with swarms of refugees. Of course there will be some who intend to cause harm who come under the guise of refugees, but there are many more who are fleeing ISIS and the terror. Can we not welcome them? Especially those of us who are Christians. Muslims are humans too, made in the image of God and needing the good news of Jesus as much as anyone else. Instead of being afraid can we not rejoice that the Lord has brought Mohammed to the mountain? And who knows but that in the providence of God, as Western liberal society rejects its own foundations, Muslims might be used to help us reconsider what we are throwing away.

10. Jesus is the answer. Of course I believe that Jesus is the answer. But just saying it is not really helpful. Again, we have to ask who are we saying it to. The trouble is that we need to get people asking the right questions first. We hold services to express solidarity, help people to think, and to bring us together as a community – although how that works in a secular multi-faith society is a bit of an issue. Is it blasphemous for me to wonder whether this is not much more than therapeutic civic religion window dressing? Can I dare to suggest that a more appropriate Christian response might be to:

a) Pray and repent.

b) Calm down and think, as Peter Hitchens has urged.

c) Welcome and serve Muslims who come to this country.

d) Know our own faith better.

e) Not fear. Jesus is Lord and the gates of hell will not prevail against his Church. Let’s look to him and not just our own prejudices, preconceptions and fears.

David Robertson is the moderator of the Free Church of Scotland and director of Solas CPC, Dundee.
Also this on the Free Church website Free Church Moderator on Welcoming Refugees



  1. Yes, to pretty much everything you wrote there David, with one exception.

    If I were with a family grieving the loss of a loved one and / or with others and it engendered peace and love I would join hands and sing Imagine if that engenders some meaning to the people I am with. What I wouldn’t do is put on rainbow coloured braces, pick up a guitar and sing kum by ya in a way that many people can’t connect with even though it has the words “my Lord”.

    I would be in favour of doing what Christ did with the parables and speaking the word in ways that people can hear and not always what is most comfortable for me. It seems that Christ did do one or two things that the religious authorities disapproved of if my memory serves me correctly.

    1. Sorry Adam…I can’t imagine Jesus holding hands with the Pharisees or the Devil and singing along with their songs just because it ‘engendered some meaning to the people he was with’! I won’t sing lies or hypocrisy for anyone!

      1. I hear you David and I agree that he wouldn’t be holding hands with the devil or the pharisees. However neither would he be looking to fight with the grieving but offer them comfort and release for the oppressed.

        Good for you with not singing lies or hypocrisy! I’m quite happy to sing about imaging all the people living life in peace. You may say I’m a dreamer, but I’m not the only one.

      2. Not the question….would he sing something which was clearly against his Father just to ‘engender meaning’….And I’m not interested in ‘dreaming’ fantasies. They never help anyone. Stick with the Truth!

      3. Well cessationists don’t believe in dreams and visions of course. You may be one, I don’t know but others do believe that God speaks in dreams. The word of God does talk of dreaming and visions in young and old men as we know and a vision of the future is all tribes and all nations joining together bowing the knee at Jesus. I don’t have a problem with dreaming about that. So hoping for that is something I desire, it’s a wonderful in fact is it not? People living in peace? Is that not the truth?

        You make a claim that the lyrics of imagine are “clearly against the Father”. Please tell me what you base your claim on with specific reference to the particular words of the lyrics and why you understand them to be opposed to God.

      4. Again jumping round like a jack in the box…unable to stick to one point in the endless waffle of the never ending cycle…!

        Dreams in the bible are revelations of God – not fantasies.

        John Lennon was not singing about people bowing the knee to Jesus – nor are the atheists who take it as their anthem. Please don’t patronise them by pretending he was and they are.

        Imagine there’s no heaven
        It’s easy if you try
        No hell below us
        Above us only sky
        Imagine all the people
        Living for today…

        Imagine there’s no heaven. Jesus went to prepare a place for us….how much more opposed do you want….? Or are you just dreaming again?

      5. I’m sorry, you seem a little upset. did I do something to offend you?

        Looking back on the comments you started with “engender meaning”. In context where I used those words were with joining hands with those grieving and peace and love being the “engender meaning”, it being relevant ways to those who are grieving. The words of the song that talk about people living in peace are consistent with that are they not?

        You then talked of dreaming fantasies and sticking with the truth. OK then I talked of people living in peace being consistent with the bible about Jesus and all tribes gathered. So then that would be truth would it not?

        I then asked you to show me please where the lyrics of Imagine were clearly “against the Father”. I hear you using an argument about heaven but there is no mention of the Father in the lyric. Therefore you claim, brother is unsubstantiated.

        You make some rhetorical comments about the way I am commenting, patronising and dreaming – a diatribe which I won’t engage further with than this sentence.

        So dreams revelations of God yes but also the sense of awe inspiring. And where there are dreams of peace, who’s to say that this is not God working in someone with common grace? There are stories I have heard shared of Iranians being converted to Christianity through dreams. Could it not be that in the imagination of artists God is working too? If a the King of Babylon with its pagan gods could be called a “servant of the Lord” could it not be that God could be working perhaps in unusual and surprising ways with the least likely of people today? So I agree, Lennon was not singing about Jesus, but could this not be one part in getting to that?

        You do have a valid point about imagining no heaven and I hear your objection to that. I would be inclined to show grace about that.

        There is something about the song that encourages people to go “beyond the tangible and visible, the immediate and status quo and to imagine a different world” as Nick Bairn states in “Finding Faith (Stories of Music and Life) pg 24.

        Perhaps even as you have stated, have you not, there could be an element of “ploughing the field” happening in order that there might be fertile ground in which to sow seeds?

        Jesus is the way, the truth and the life but sometimes God does work in surprising ways. It would be a shame to miss out on that and tragic if how God is working is deemed as sinfulness, and blasphemy as it was by some when they spoke of Jesus.

      6. No Adam…I’m not a little upset. Stop playing games and don’t patronise. Just to go through your points one by one – although I don’t think there is much point because you just keep evading any answers.

        1) You said you would hold hands and sing with people who sing against religion, heaven etc because it helps them engender meaning. Apart from being meaningless waffle it is also patronising. Why would you sing a lie?

        2) You said imagine is not against the Father because it doesn’t mention the Father. Do you not agree that when the Son speaks, the Father speaks? Did he not speak of heaven? If you don’t accept the teaching of the Father, you are attacking the Father. Lennon wrote this song as an attack on religion and belief in God. (witness his other song ‘God’). You twist words, waffle and try to excuse this nonsense and blasphemy as somehow God working. I’m not sure what kind of God you believe in – but one who tells us to sing songs that say he does not exist or is a liar, seems to me to be a God not worth mentioning.

        Actually I don’t think I’ll bother with the rest of your points. It is as I said typical meaningless waffle of those who seek to justify either theirs or others sin in the name of tolerance and love! I don’t buy it….and I find it somewhat perverse that you think Imagine is not an attack on God – unlike its author who clearly thought that it was. It is of course impossible to argue with people who use emotion, play games and ignore the basic and plain meaning of words…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *