This is my latest article for Evangelicals Now
Gossip is no longer just local – it’s global
The woman was horrified… “You wouldn’t dare do that”. She was a member in the church and had just been told by the pastor that she was likely to be disciplined for her continual sinful behaviour, unless she repented. What had she done? Adultery? Theft? Abuse? No – she was a persistent gossip, continually slandering people within and beyond the congregation.
It’s not often you hear of that – and yet the Bible speaks strongly about the sin of gossip. “Without wood a fire goes out; without a gossip a quarrel dies down.” (Prov.26 v20 NIV) “You shall not go around as a slanderer among your people, and you shall not stand up against the life of your neighbour: I am the Lord” (Lev.19v16 ESV). “Brothers and sisters, do not slander one another. Anyone who speaks against a brother or sister or judges them speaks against the law and judges it” (James 4v11NIV).
It is also interesting just how many times the Psalmist David expresses concern about those who tell lies about him. He knew that whilst spears and arrows could harm, words were just as dangerous: “Deliver me, O Lord, from lying lips, from a deceitful tongue” (Ps 120v2).
In today’s world – where a lie can go round the world in seconds and be repeated ad nauseam on the internet – gossip is no longer just local. It’s global.
As someone in ministry for 40 years it has been something that I have had to deal with. At a local level in a Highland village, you knew that you were also going to be the victim of gossip. The same thing occurred to a lesser extent in the city of Dundee. But where I have really felt the problem is with a more public ministry – as an author, broadcaster and public evangelist. To cite a few examples – The London Review of Books ran a 4,000-word article attacking Kate Forbes (SNP leader candidate), the Free Church, and yours truly. I was smeared as some kind of nutty right wing American-style fundamentalist. It didn’t matter that none of the accusations were true. They were eruditely expressed by an academic with a grudge, and they fitted the presuppositions that people had of the church and me.
As a chaplain at the University of Dundee I would occasionally get word from the Principal’s office that yet another LGBT activist group from the South of England was asking for me to be fired because I made them feel “unsafe”. But it wasn’t just LGBT groups. One broadcaster told me that he wanted to have me on his programme more often, but it was the clergy “advisors” who warned him against it.
This kind of opposition and gossip occurs in Christian circles as well. After speaking at the University of St Andrews Christian Union, I was approached by the President who expressed both his appreciation and his surprise that I was “sound”. Being a card-carrying Westminster Calvinist and knowing he was a charismatic, I wondered why he thought I might be “unsound”? Because a fellow Reformed pastor in England had warned him about my lack of orthodoxy!
I write articles for several websites and magazines. Numerous times people have written to the editors accusing me of various things and suggesting I be cancelled. Too right wing, too left wing, too strong, not strong enough…
Why does this happen? Because the tongue is a “restless evil, full of deadly poison” (James 3v8). This is not to say that we should never be criticised – after all some of us clearly need the “faithful wounds of a friend” (Prov. 27v6) – but rather that there is a Christian way to do so. We speak the truth in love (Eph. 4v15). We speak directly to those who have offended us, not telling tales to the authorities, or gossiping to friends. And we should never encourage such gossip. I have learned to just throw anonymous complaints about others into the bin.
In a world where language and speech are often abused; where “misinformation” is passed on as lies, and truth is condemned as misinformation; it is especially important that we offer a better word. And that we take on board the many teachings in Scripture about how, where and when we speak. Can we not learn to disagree well? Those of us who are conflict averse need to be careful that we are not afraid to speak directly rather than engage in indirect speech (gossip). Those of us who seem to be conflict-driven need to repent of our aggressive speech and learn to follow the One who spoke strongly but was also gentle.
It’s a minefield for speaker/writer and hearer/reader alike. But one we have to traverse. We need to bear in mind the ninth commandment and the fact that those who “love and practice falsehood” are outside the city (Rev.21v15). Perhaps every time we write, or engage in a significant conversation, we should pray – “May these words of my mouth and this meditation of my heart be pleasing in your sight, Lord, my Rock and my Redeemer” (Ps.19v14).
David Robertson, is the minster of Scots Kirk Presbyterian Church, Newcastle NSW and blogs at http://www.theweeflea.com

Such a timely word, although not brilliant comfort for our church which seems to have an epidemic of gossip and seemingly little appetite from the leadership to quash it.
We had a situation earlier this year which got so out of hand that our music director has been off for 2 months because of a sense of “fear” in entering the building, because of confrontation due to inaccurate and harmful gossip. Later she received an anonymous letter in the post telling her she is no longer wanted in the church. She acted 100% in accordance with Kirk Session’s directives, stepping aside from normal responsibilities to try to “keep the peace”, but the gossip said otherwise. The gossip put her as the cause.
The theory of all of this is fine, but like so many situations when you find yourself in the middle, reality is different.
Thanks for this article! I think if you’re in leadership, gossip will come. I think if the church is active and the Spirit is working, Satan will attack, and gossip is a very effective attack.
Good and True writing, David.., in these VUCA days, and of too much misinformation and disinformation being spread around, and great to hear the Good News of the Gospel and the Biblical Truth of gossip, idle gossip & slander in today’s AI and fast media communications times…
Heartily agree David
St Bride’s Church in London is associated with journalism. Their website features this prayer:-
The Journalists’ Prayer
Almighty God,
strengthen and direct, we pray,
the will of all whose work it is to write what many read,
and to speak where many listen.
May we be bold in confronting evil and injustice,
and compassionate in our understanding of human weakness,
rejecting alike the half-truth that deceives, and the slanted word that corrupts.
May the power that is ours, for good or ill,
always be used with respect and integrity;
so that when all here has been written, said, and done,
we may, unashamed, meet Thee face to face,
through Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen.
Don’t think the journos at the Heil, Torygraph, Express and Sun adhere to this prayer. Like Messrs Tice and Vance – their Christianity is of the cardboard variety.
The exposure, of savage maltreatment of innocent people by abusive clergy, has featured honest journalists doing exceptionally valuable work. Did Daily Tele have quite a role where the C of E was hiding atrocious bullies or abusers like Pilavachi? Channel 4 and Cathy Newman were effective on John Smyth QC which forced the Archbishop of Canterbury into retirement. Likewise, did the media do the Church a favour by exposing the rot at Bangor Cathedral which forced Andrew John to retire from the primate job. Aberdeen Diocese and the Episcopal Church have stirred interest. The Canon W G Neely scandal in Irish Anglicanism has also been exposed by media attention and interest. It highlights the extent to which Anglican leaders are ready to go to shield abusers [KRWLAW posted: ‘Neely abuse: Church of Ireland Bishop ‘apologises’ for unnamed rector – ignores
Belfast-Tipperary transfer’] The secular media can be a very powerful and purifying force for good, as specifically can Christian media staff.
The disappointing thing with social media amongst other platforms when replying to comments is the absence of meaningful discussion on an issue. If you’re ‘swimming against the tide’ as biblical thinkers will be, then expect vitriol and a lack of critical thinking if you have the temerity to post a comment which goes against the narrative. There is absolutely no room for an alternative take on something that has already been settled by consensus, so if you’re brave enough you’ll need a pretty thick skin to engage with the mob.