Australia Equality Ethics Sport

Can a White Person Suffer from Racism – CT

An edited version of this article was published on Christian Today here. 

This is the original…

The Curious Case of the Chelsea Football Star and Racism

It seems such a trivial story.  The kind of story that only the most vacuous gossip tabloids would be interested in.  A famous footballer allegedly gets drunk, throws up in the back of a cab, the police are called, and the footballer abuses them. Now the Chelsea footballer has been charged with ‘racially aggravated harassment’ of a police officer in London.  What’s the big deal?  And why should we care about any of it?

The footballer is the Australian women’s captain, Sam Kerr.  She is a bit of a hero in her own country and one of the most famous female footballers in the world.  The incident occurred in Jan 2023, but has only come to light in the past week, due to the Sun newspaper reporting it.  At first some people here in Australia were horrified – could our superstar be racist?  That must be impossible – she is a woman!  She is gay!  She is a woman of colour!  (Apparently having one Indian grandmother is enough to cancel out the three other white grandparents).  And she has impeccable progressive views – at least in public!  But has she turned out to be a closet racist?

And then the news came of the phrase she is supposed to have used.  ‘Stupid white B….”.  It wasn’t just a sense of relief – it was almost hysterical joy that erupted on social media.  Suddenly the phrase was being used all over the place with pictures of white male politicians being attached to it. And therein lies the seriousness of what is an otherwise silly and trivial story.  It demonstrates the contradictions, inconsistencies and confusion within our culture caused by identity politics – especially identity politics fuelled by critical race theory.

Because in critical race theory – white people are always racist and can never be the victims of racism.   Those of us simpletons who just understood racism as discriminating against someone because of their race or skin colour, are way behind the curve on this.  As the Guardian, the Sydney Morning Herald, the ABC and numerous online commentators told us “To call someone ‘white’ cannot be racist” – because you cannot be racist against white people. Apparently to accuse someone who attacks someone because of their white skin colour of racism is to ‘gaslight’ the real victims.   The Guardian is worried that our doctrine of racism is not pure enough.   “Racism is no longer the ideology that accompanies racial capitalist systems of colonialism, slavery and imperialism; it becomes a matter of individual morality”

So, there you have it.  Racism wasn’t really about individual morality.  It all has to do with capitalism, colonialism, slavery and imperialism – which clearly are things that white people alone do.  The progressives have drunk so deep at the well of critical race ideology that they seem unaware of the history of the human race.  Red and yellow, black and white, may all be precious in Jesus’ site, but we also have all at some time or other engaged in slavery, imperialism and colonialism.  I’ve even met some Chinese, African and Arab capitalists!

The term slave comes from the white Slavs – because so many of them were taken into slavery by Arab/African traders.  No race or nation can be free from the charge of slavery.   But there is only one Empire – which got rid of it – at great cost.  And that was the British Empire whose conscience had been stirred by Christianity.   The trans-Atlantic slave trade was horrific – and to be repented of.   But equally we must note the role that the British played in getting rid of slavery in many countries of the world.  Sam Kerr’s own country, Australia, has never had slavery – despite it being one of those capitalist, imperialist colonies – or dare I suggest that it was because it was one of those capitalist imperialist colonies?

But the crypto- Marxist critical race theory which has infected the upper echelons of our society means that you can say white is black, and even black is not black – especially if you are ‘the wrong kind’ of black.    According to this ideology successful people of colour in the UK, like the Prime Minister Rishi Sunak or Kemi Badenoch, are just ‘Uncle Toms’.  They are perceived as tools in the hands of the white oppressors!

Another example of this ‘double think’ comes from South Australia where a judge ruled in a case involving a woman attacking someone because they were white that being “white” per se is not descriptive of any particular ethnic, national or racial group. Nor is it of itself a term of abuse. White people are the dominant people historically and culturally within Australia. They are not in any sense an oppressed group, whose political and civil rights are under threat.’”  Just think how inane that remark is and if taken to its logical conclusion (although logic does seem to have disappeared out of much of modern society – probably because it is seen as a tool of Western colonialism!) what it would mean.

Black, brown and yellow skin colours are all indicative of race.  White isn’t.  Although there is apparently still a white race which oppresses people. Go figure.

Although white people are not an ethnic, national or racial group, they still have the dominant culture in Australia where 90.2% of the population are white.  So they cannot be oppressed.  Try telling that to the white working-class poor.    Does this mean that if I go to a country like Nigeria where blacks are the predominant culture, or China…that I cannot be racist in using racial slurs against black or Chinese people?!

Despite all the theory and the jargon there is a double standard at play here.  Let’s return to Sam Kerr’s alleged abuse.  Just substitute the word ‘black’ for ‘white’ in ‘stupid white B….” and then imagine how the Guardian, Chelsea, the BBC would have reported it.  She would be outed as an absolute villain.  But now because she has used the right kind of racism, she is a hero who can play the victim card.

This is why a rich sporting celebrity (Kerr is estimated to be worth $5 million) can portray herself as a powerless victim against a copper who was only doing his duty.   In this brave new world skin colour trumps everything – Kerr is a ‘woman of colour’ because her grandmother is Indian.  I’m not sure of the rules of the game but apparently having one non-white grandparent is enough to atone for the sins of the other three in being white.  It also helps if your chips include being gay and a woman – in the great game, that’s like having an identity politics full house!.

Another incident noted by the commentator Konstantin Kisin, that also occurred in London, has added further evidence as to just how far down the rabbit hole our society has gone in this craziness.   Imagine if I advocated as a playwright that only white people would be allowed into a West End theatre, because they were a different kind of audience?    But that is precisely what Jeremy O’Harris told the BBC was going to happen at one of his theatres where a Black Out night would be just for black people.

https://twitter.com/KonstantinKisin/status/1763414605387223162?s=20

The only justification for this is to divide people by race and to exaggerate and tell falsehoods such as black people do not feel safe in going to the theatre.

I once sat in an art gallery in Sydney where a man who was whiter than me (and I am a pale Scot!) told us all that he felt uncomfortable being in a room full of largely white people!  It was victim playing par excellence – and the 200 people in the room applauded him.  I walked away thinking that Western society has gone completely mad.   We are magnifying racism, increasing division by race and reinventing apartheid when we adopt this insane ideology.

The Church should be able to provide the answer for this. But sadly, much of the Church has also swallowed wholesale the Critical Race Theory doctrines.  The Church of England for example is only speeding its inevitable oblivion by spending lots of money hiring ‘deconstructing whiteness’ staff!

There is a biblical answer to all this.  It’s simple.  There is only one race – the human race.  To discriminate on the basis of colour is a sin.   To divide the body of Christ on that basis is worse because it negates the witness of the Church. It is in the true church that you see the true unity of humanity – where all the barriers are broken down and we are all ‘one in Christ Jesus’ (Galatians 3:28).   I once stood at my church door and noted that we had an African, Chinese, Indian and a European on door duty.  It wasn’t planned or rostered that way – it just happened.  And I was so thankful.  Because whilst the world talks about who is really black, a person of colour or racist – the Church of Jesus Christ just gets on with creating that multitude that no one can count – from every nation, tribe, people and language (Revelation 7:9).

Quantume 294 – Extremism

10 Christian Responses to Racism – Premier Christianity

Fault Lines: The Social Justice Movement and Evangelicalism’s Looming Catastrophe

SEEK 6 – Black Lives Matter

 

 

12 comments

  1. Very well written, and an excellent exposition with Clarity, David.., which we all need, including the ‘progressives’ and the so-called ‘elites’.., whom should all be sent a copy of this narrative..!

  2. There was some slavery practiced in Australia where indigenous peoples from pacific islands were illegally taken and forced to work in the cane fields of Queensland.

  3. ” Sam Kerr’s own country, Australia, has never had slavery – despite it being one of those capitalist, imperialist colonies – or dare I suggest that it was because it was one of those capitalist imperialist colonies?”

    This is factually incorrect, and you owe it as a resident in Australia to become better educated about slavery in Australia.
    1. The practice of Blackbirding, involved forcibly or deceptively taking South Sea Islanders, primarily to work in Queenslander cane plantations, but also the pearling industry.
    2. Under various systems and legislation, between 1860 and 1970, Australian Aboriginal people were subject to conditions which involved:
    a. control of their movements
    b. being subject to forced labour
    c. under threat and reality of violence
    d. paid nominal wages which were held for them, and regularly never paid.
    Such conditions were regularly referred to in the press, by rights organisations, and by Christian missionaries, as slavery and slave labour. All aspects of these peoples lives were controlled by their masters. The various state Acts in the first 20 years of the 20th century all sought to regulate Aboriginal people’s lives, and at least notionally provide and protect, but in effect led to their systemic subjugation to deprivation of liberty and the right to their own labour.

    These were legal provisions that enshrined slave labour in Australia, despite failing Australia’s obligations under the 1926 League of Nation’s Slavery Convention. Your position that there was no “legal” slavery in Australia demonstrates at the least a culpable ignorance of this country’s history.

    1. Thanks – but my point still stands. I am aware of both the Queensland situation and the Aboriginal circumstances. Much of this was equivalent to serfdom, or fits only in a much broader definition of slavery. From the Marxist perspective all paid labour for capitalists is ‘wage slavery’. The fact is that Australia, as part of the British Empire, made slavery illegal. The point is at least disputable – even the former Prime Minister stated that slavery was never legal in Australia…..so please tone down the rhetoric – I am not being ‘culpably ignorant’. I just question your definition of legal slavery…

  4. Answer to the question in the title…. yes!
    It is more than just slavery.
    I am white:
    In mid 80s I had Hispanic principal tell me “Get used to it Haar, you are in minority now!”
    In 2011 and 12, I was treated unfairly by a black principal because I refused to break federal laws to accommodate her personal family needs. The following school year she took the joy of teaching young children away by demanding inappropriate guidelines which were against the developmental needs of my children… I was forced to retire because of the abuse from this principal.

  5. Critical Race Theory is specific to the United States. Its an academic theory that because most of the current US institutions and public services were created during the era of segregation (or slavery) that they are still unfairly skewed against African Americans.

    The Republican Party has (deliberately?) misunderstood the word “critical” to mean “being negative about race” rather than “taking a detailed analysis of” and exported this meaning to the rest of the English speaking word.

    White people can of course experience racism. But the impact is smaller. If a person is denied service because they are white then its terrible and shocking, but its not like they arent going to be alternatives and, more crucially, its not the government doing it.

    1. Sadly CRT is now taught is all Western democracies where the US elites have significant influence. CRT says that white people cannot experience racism – and cannot but be racist. The fact that you feel free to defend such insanity is very revealing…

  6. Last night I happened to watch a UK quiz show from the 1970s where one of the panel members made several racist jokes about another panel member because she was Black.

    This would not be acceptable now, but its worth remembering that this is within living memory and, although racism is still alive and well (especially in the US), we are still on a trajectory to get rid of it altogether. I think its also worth pointing out that people born prior to the 90s grew up with an societal acceptance of racism that is not acceptable now and its harder for some people to adjust to new norms than others – some lag behind, some overshoot. We cannot expect everyone to think or behave the exact same way. A couple of years ago I read a novel from the 60s about an anti Black man who, through convoluted plotting, did not realize that one of his own parents was Black. If that was published today it would no doubt be written off as “woke”. It shows that in some ways we have improved on racial justice and in others we are still having the same arguments

  7. I find it truly disgusting how the radical left tries to portray racism and sexism and all these other -isms where they barely exist, yet has absolutely nothing to say in situations where they actually *do* exist. Have you *ever* seen a leftist white woman complain about the treatment of women in majority Muslim countries? Or the treatment of certain ethnic minorities in China?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *