Culture Judaism Liberalism Media Newspaper/Magazine Articles Scotland Sex and sexuality

LED 5 – Barcelona, Charlottesville – Glasgow Pride – Love is Love – Sarah Champion – The Real Modern Slavery – Google’s Tolerance – Endeavour – Is the Church like an Empty Whisky Bottle? – Kris Kristofferson

Light Engaging Darkness 5 –

1) Feel the Hate – Barcleona, Finland and Charlottesville –


The world seems full of violence and hate.  one person killed in Charlottesville by a far right extremist, another two in Finland and 14 in Barcelona by Islamists.    What has astounded me, and it really shouldn’t because now  we should expect it, is the different reactions from most of our media and many of our politicians and commentators.   On the one hand we have  an endless stream of news about the danger of far right extremists in the United States. On the other, any time an Islamist attack occurs, our media and politicians are very quick to reassure us that this has nothing to do with Islam and that to even suggest that it does is to commit the sin of Islamaphobia!

Once again Brendan O’Neill expresses it best

“The footage coming out of Barcelona is deeply disturbing. In terms of ideological hatred, violent misanthropy and utter contempt for the freedom of everyday life, America’s neo-Nazis don’t even come close to these Islamist sects.”

“They’re still talking about Charlottesville. Still. Even as the barbarism in Barcelona raises the number of European citizens slaughtered by Islamists since 2014 to *461*. Four-hundred-and-sixty-one people killed in Europe in three years. Four-hundred-and-sixty-one. Let that sink in for a minute. By extremists who loathe liberty, democracy and mankind far more seriously than those sad neo-Nazis in the US do. But don’t look back in anger, eh? We wouldn’t want to create community tensions. “Don’t make a scene” — that’s always the response to Islamist terror.The message is so clear now: the political set will only give a shit about you if you’re killed by a white extremist.”

The reactions are so contradictory –  on the one hand the Islamist question is ‘complicated’ –  on the other  far right extremists in the United States are simple – they are Nazis and Nazis are bad. End of. The latter simplistic attitude allows people to virtue signal on social media like crazy – something that the wonderful Babylon Bee captured well in this satirical piece. Man Willing to go on Internet to say Nazis are Bad


But we have no idea how to deal with Islamist extremists.   Militant secularists say that it’s all religion to blame – as though the Catholics and Quakers are as culpable as the Islamists.   Politicians say it’s nothing to do with Islam.   This tweet shows the weakness and pathetic ineptitude of the West. We deal with militant Islam by tweeting pictures of cats!

Even as I post this I am listening to a UK government spokesperson say that we need stronger legislation on online hate crime – and the example he gives is Charlottesville – not Barcelona.  Why?



2) Feel the Love –

But if you’re fed up of the hatred in our cultural elites have a solution for you – feel the love! Love is Love as Glasgow takes to the Streets with Pride

The Glasgow Pride weekend received an enormous amount of coverage –  despite the fact that it was attended, even with all the publicity and promotion, by just 5000 people.  But that did include the great, the good and the corporations. What fascinated me most about it was Nicola Sturgeon’s speech.    I suspect it will not be used in any collection of great 21st-century speeches!  There was an astonishing revelation – apparently  “love is love”. Cue loud applause at this brilliant insight!  Ranks with ‘Brexit is Brexit’ and ‘Bread is Bread’!  Who would have thought it?!   But what is love? Is it different from lust? Is it just an emotion? Is it a chemical imbalance? Is every feeling that we call ‘love’ justification for what we want to do? If a man says that he loves his wife, but he also loves his secretary, and his best friend – does that mean that he is entitled to sleep with all three? After all love is love! Was our first Minister telling us that she’s about to allow polygamy –  because after all love is love?  What about two brothers who ‘love’ one another?  Love is after all love.

From the Christian perspective we know what love is – God is love.  “God is love. This is how God showed his love among us: He sent his one and only Son into the world that we might live through him.   This is love: not that we loved God, but that he loved us and sent his Son as the an atoning sacrifice for our sins.  Dear friends, since God so loved us, we also ought to love one another”(1 John 4:8-11).   This is how I know what love is – but what does our First Minister mean when she uses the term? – and when people applaud, do they know what they are applauding?

There was a more chilling aspect to her speech:

“We are going to continue to make progress – over the next months we are going to continue to work with the TIE campaign…to stop bullying…”. Also to get Equal marriage in Northern Ireland and we wil start consultation we have committed to, to reform the gender laws…..transgender, non-binary or intersex……‘with the love that is in Glasgow Green today – together we will do it….”

Notice once again the farce of the ‘consultation’  on reforming the gender laws to allow anyone just to change their gender at the stroke of a pen.   There will be no consultation –  at least not in any meaningful sense. The First Minister has decided that love is love and that love means allowing people to change their gender whatever the medical and scientific evidence says. And if you don’t agree we will hate you…!

Speaking of love, this has apparently become the most retweeted tweet of all time.



I cannot help but feel that it is well-meaning and expresses a great sentiment but that it is trite and superficial. One hesitates to disagree with former President Obama but when he states that ““People must learn to hate, and if they can learn to hate, they can be taught to love, for love comes more naturally to the human heart than its opposite.” I’m afraid I have to question – on what basis does he make that statement? He may wish it to be true but is there any empirical evidence that it is true? There is a tendency to ignore the biblical teaching about the human heart – which is is that it is desperately wicked and deceitful above all things. Ignoring that means that we end up with trite comments and superficial solutions. The fact is that both love and hatred are in every human heart. Nice tweets don’t change that and don’t make the world a better place.


Gay Pride Glasgow 2Back to the Glasgow Pride Rally. Although the gay lobbyists now have control of the Establishment all is not well in ‘Pride’ world.  There was some dissent at the role of the police, heading the parade (they are setting themselves up nicely for being the thought police of the regime) and at the role of the corporations.   This article was fascinating.

It appears that even with all the victories the gay lobbyists have won – in the most successful social change movement in modern times – it will never be enough.  Victim status is so ingrained that it needs to be continually fed.   When the results of the social revolution don’t turn out as expected you can expect the blame shifting to begin and the ‘love’ to quickly turn to hate.

Meanwhile the State sponsored indoctrination continues – Nick Gibb another ‘equalities minister’ wants all children to be taught explicit gay sex.

In case you missed it last week I received the most ridiculous and inane response from a government minister that you are likely to.  Justine Greening Responds – The Banality of Evil  In actual fact several people I know received almost word for word the same response. In other words the UK government, like the Scottish government, has no interest in what voters think – if we do not go along  with their authoritarian doctrines, we are just to be dismissed by robotic inane letter which answers nothing.

3) Sacked for telling the Truth – Sarah Champion, the shadow Equalities minister has ‘resigned’ after stating that ““Britain has a problem with British Pakistani _97418424_mediaitem97418423men raping and exploiting white girls”.” She is from Rotherham where over 1500 white working class girls were abused because the social work, police and politicians were too scared of being called racist.  To make such a statement is not to accuse all Pakistani men of being abusers.  But to ignore the culture and ethnicity of those mostly involved is not only foolish but dangerous.   Imagine if this had been a situation where it was only black children who had been abused – by white racists. You think for one minute that Jeremy Corbyn would have fired his equalities Minister for pointing that out? There is a complete double standard.

4) The Real Modern Slavery

Spectator cover_19_aug_post 2 Please listen to this superb podcast from the Spectator and then read Julie Bindall’s article.  on the same subject.

Again it is astounding that many of those who were marching at the gay pride event argue that there is such a thing as a ‘sex worker’ –  as though it were a legitimate career and something to be desired. Bindal’s article destroys the myth of the Happy Hooker –  and shows that many of those who class themselves as “sex workers” are in fact pimps, brothel owners and pornographers.    This is modern-day slavery  and so many of our cultural elites support it  because of their ignorance and their fear of being perceived to be non-politically correct.   Bindal researched this article for over a year and it is clear that her work has been well done.

5) The Media Portrayal of Christians in Drama continues to reflect and create prejudice.

I loved Inspector Morse – and then the sequel Lewis – but astonishingly for me I think the prequel – Endeavour is even better.   Watching one of the latest episodes though reminded me of how ‘mast-004322-hires-590x332subtle’ the media is in portraying Christians.  Without spoiling the plot it involves a ‘Mary Whitehouse’ figure campaigning against ‘filth’ on the BBC and in the media – cue images and caricatures of hard, miserable fuddy-duddies who are total repressed hypocrites.   It is a drama but it is from such dramas that people get their impressions and images.   I just wonder what any script writer will have the courage, intelligence and nuance to portray Christians as human, real and yes sinners but also people who may have a point?

6) Google’s Orwellian Version of Tolerance-

This article from Spiked   is a good commentary on the intolerance of Google – who fired one of their employees, James Damore, for daring to express something that was true (like Sarah Champion) but which didn’t fit with their ‘values’.

The reality, as we are now glimpsing, is that Google is just like other companies: it doesn’t really welcome free expression, and it doesn’t like to be criticised. That doesn’t mean that Google is ready to discard its claims to openness. In the midst of explaining to employees why he fired Damore, Pichai asserted that ‘we strongly support the right of Googlers to express themselves’. But presumably only if they express agreement with Google.

And don’t think it is just their employees. There is the extraordinary case of Jordan Jordan-B-Peterson-e1501093408470Peterson whose thoughtful and stimulating videos were banned by Google because he refused to use what they considered to be proper gender pronouns.

It was good to read this article from Kevin McKenna in The Herald – recognising what is going on in our culture – ironically an article about hatred and intolerance was met with a response of hatred and intolerance!

7) Is the Church like an empty Whisky bottle?

I have been engaging in a clear out from my study.  Its been really hard trying to be ruthless and get rid of books – but so far I have managed – duplicates, ones I won’t read again and some that are really just taking up space.   Some have gone to the local second hand bookshop – the good ones have gone to the Church for people just to take – and the rubbish ones went to the dump.  I’m sorry but there is no way that for example I could pass on any of Brian Mclaren’s heretical drivel.  I want to give the pure water of the Gospel, not the poison of that which seeks to destroy the Gospel.

IMG_1411Another thing I have found hard to get rid of is my whisky bottles and containers.  (Before the e-mails start I fully accept that there are Christians who think that drinking alcohol is wrong and I respect but disagree with their opinion – for me malt whisky is a small pleasure which the Lord has given us to enjoy – the ‘wine that makes glad the heart of a man’ as Ps 104 tells us – of course drunkenness is wrong).    I don’t actually have any bottles that contain whisky – the well has run dry!

But I do collect the containers.  Much to the puzzlement of Mrs R.  Why? is the not IMG_1410IMG_1406unreasonable question she asked.  I have to say that I didn’t really have an answer beyond – ‘I like it’ – which was not really adequate and since I need the space they have all gone!



Which set me thinking – empty bottles of the ‘uisge-beatha’ (water of life) are useless if they don’t contain any of it.  Like churches which once knew the blessing of the Lord and had spiritual life, but now have just become empty shells (and I am not referring to the buildings but to the congregations, denominations etc).   The container is there – but the life has long gone.  It reminded me of something that I read in John Owen’s the Glory of Christ – 

“That which was faith truly spiritual and evangelical in their first planting, becomes a lifeless opinion in succeeding ages. The same truths are still professed, but that profession springs not from the same causes, nor does it produce the same effects in the hearts and lives of men. Hence, in process of time, some churches continue to have an appearance of the same body which they were at first, but – being examined – are like a lifeless, breathless carcase, wherein the animating Spirit of grace does not dwell. And then is any church, as it was with that of the Jews, nigh to destruction, when it corrupts formerly professed truths, to accommodate them  unto the present lusts and inclinations of men.” (P103- Owen vol 1) . )

Finally something to cheer up your work – this wonderful clip of Kris Kristofferson explaining how he wrote the song ‘ Why me, Lord?”…Enjoy – see you next week…


 LED 4 – Neo-Nazis and Antifa – Trump and North Korea – State Religion enforces Female Clergy – The Morality of Holidays – The Decline of the SNP and rise of Labour – Shoes, Gender Neutral Tampons, KLM and the Genderless Child – Glenn Campbell – Bill Jamieson
















  1. I half-heard some worrying stuff on the news this morning. The DPP (I think) talking about the need to prosecute so-called ‘hate crime’. Apparently the English and Welsh courts were clogged with 15,000 cases last year, but they’re bringing in guidelines to bring more categories into the net. More needs to be done, she said. The list of hate crimes sounded to me like a list of Biblical moral teachings. But I was only half awake.

  2. Regarding no.7 I have thought for a while that there was a blog post waiting to be written regarding whisky. I shall now remember your comparison of the church to an empty whisky bottle whenever I am enjoying a small nightcap.

    I do appreciate the reason for empty containers and fully understand why they remained on the shelf. But I was sad to see that there were no Penderyn containers. I am not sure if their fine products have made it to from Wales to Scotland yet, but I can highly recommend Aur Cymru, should it ever appear on the shelves of a Scottish supermarket.

  3. Regarding Blog No.1 and Islam:

    Saint Thomas Aquinas (1225 – 1274), immensely influential philosopher and theologian states:

    “On the other hand, those who founded sects committed to erroneous doctrines proceeded in a way that is opposite to this, The point is clear in the case of Muhammad. He seduced the people by promises of carnal pleasure to which the concupiscence of the flesh goads us.”

    “His teaching also contained precepts that were in conformity with his promises, and he gave free reign to carnal pleasure. In all this, as is not unexpected, he was obeyed by carnal men. As for proofs of the truth of his doctrine, he brought forward only such as could be grasped by the natural ability of anyone with a very modest wisdom. Indeed, the truths that he taught he mingled with many fables and with doctrines of the greatest falsity. He did not bring forth any signs produced in a supernatural way, which alone fittingly gives witness to divine inspiration; for a visible action that can be only divine reveals an invisibly inspired teacher of truth.”

    “On the contrary, Muhammad said that he was sent in the power of his arms—which are signs not lacking even to robbers and tyrants. What is more, no wise men, men trained in things divine and human, believed in him from the beginning, Those who believed in him were brutal men and desert wanderers, utterly ignorant of all divine teaching, through whose numbers Muhammad forced others to become his followers by the violence of his arms.”

    “Nor do divine pronouncements on the part of preceding prophets offer him any witness. On the contrary, he perverts almost all the testimonies of the Old and New Testaments by making them into fabrications of his own, as can be seen by anyone who examines his law. It was, therefore, a shrewd decision on his part to forbid his followers to read the Old and New Testaments, lest these books convict him of falsity. It is thus clear that those who place any faith in his words believe foolishly.”


  4. Pride. Is not that a sin?
    All you need is love – a Beatles legacy from hippydom.
    So is Kristofferson, but it seems he now knows true love. Just shows you don’t need a fully formed theology, of the reformed type, to be ignorant of your need for Christ, just a supernatural calling from Him even through a much derided altar-call. Even when you are not seeking Him. Mongerism indeed.
    Love Divine, All loves excelling. Something Augustine knew.

    As for malt , I have a much faded olfactory memory of my then favourite -Lagavulin , but that was donkeys years ago. It seems to be very expensive now. Probably was then.

  5. “It appears that even with all the victories the gay lobbyists have won – in the most successful social change movement in modern times – it will never be enough.”

    It will be enough when I and my friends can walk hand in hand down Buchanan St, Princes St or any other street in Scotland with the people we love without fear of verbal abuse or physical violence.

  6. I share both David’s propensity to collect things and his desire, now, too divest himself of things which he feels, however reluctantly, he can dispose of in order to give himself more space. My local Marie Curie shop has been receiving a steady flow of donated items over the past few years. However, there is one collection of items which I am reluctant to put into the recycling bin but for which I have been unable to find an alternative home. This is a collection of guide books to ancient monuments both secular and religious in the care of various government bodies ranging back to the Ministry of Buildings and Public Works. None of these guide books can now be purchased at these places as they have been replaced by newer guide books. I am not looking for any money in return for them but if anybody is interested in acquiring them please put a comment on this blog. I am sure that some way of arranging a transfer can be arranged. I fear that they will soon be ending up in the recycling bin. Which would be a pity.

  7. To expand on your point about the media portrayal of Christians, are you familiar with a 1991 novel, Flicker, by the late Theodore Roszak? It might be described as something of an ‘anti-Dan Brown’ as, although the Cathars are central to the plot, they are depicted as the death cult they were. My reason for mentioning the novel is that reading it made me consider how much moral poison is released to us in the form of entertainment—not just the infamous left-wing slant that the entertainment industy has long been notorious for but simple nihilism: attacking the foundations of Western Civilisation without offering an alternative.

    Consider, for example, just about any Film Noir: solid, gritty tales, but the vast majority ended on a hopeful note—as Oscar Wilde famously wrote, ‘The good ended happily, and the bad unhappily. That is what Fiction means.’ For every corrupt copper depicted, there are a dozen honest ones only too happy to take him down; the flatfoots might be too keen to go for the obvious suspect but once nudged in the direction of the actual bad guy, they’ll happily haul him off instead. A person can walk out of the cinema thinking that the ‘System’ has its faults but it’s still better than most anywhere else—and certainly better that what any Uncle Joe, Adolf, Benito or Tojo is offering. We just gotta do the right thing.

    In contrast, take for example a film considered by many a ‘classic’ and film noir revival—1974’s Chinatown. IMDB rates it at 8.2 compared to 8.5 for Casablanca and Rotten Tomatoes gives it 98%/93% while giving the latter 97%/95%. Chinatown is certainly a technically accomplished film—the direction is fine, the script well-written, and the acting superb; but it is poison. You walk away from it feeling dirty, thinking that the entire System is garbage, the cops all corrupt, the rich all pervs, and there’s nothing anyone can do about it—‘Forget it, Jake. It’s Chinatown,’ as the film’s last line goes. It’s nihilistic poison.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

%d bloggers like this: