Here is my latest article on Christian Today – you can get the original here….
Is Carney’s Davos sermon the way forward?
Mark Carney, the Prime Minister of Canada, made a ‘viral’ speech at the World Economic Forum in Davos this week. According to the Guardian it was “the greatest political speech of recent times”. To other commentators, it was a “watershed”, a move away from “technocratic globalism”. My X feed is full of people saying it was the light that the world needed and that Carney’s Canada has provided hope for the West. Others tell me that he is now the “leader of the free world”. “He is also potentially the new leader of the Free World, a role model of honesty, intelligence, and visionary thinking. He understands the long arc of history,” one said.
I have heard and read the speech several times. It is well delivered, articulate, calm and intelligent. If you contrast his style with the ‘stream of consciousness’ rambling of President Trump it does come across, as many have suggested, that he is ‘the adult in the room’. What has taken me a little by surprise is the extent to which so many Christians seem to agree and think that this may herald the end of an era, and the beginning of a new better one. But does the reality live up to the hype?
In January 2018 another Canadian Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau, also delivered a speech at Davos. His was entitled ‘the Canadian opportunity’ and focused on gender equality, progressive trade and corporate responsibility. It was widely lauded and praised. But, as was feared at the time, it was all rhetoric and no action. Is Carney’s any different?
The Main Points of the Speech
Carney called the old-world order ‘a pleasant fiction’ – he admitted that the system he had perpetuated and served was false.“We knew the story of the international rules-based order was partially false, that the strongest would exempt themselves when convenient, that trade rules were enforced asymmetrically. And we knew that international law applied with varying rigour depending on the identity of the accused or the victim.” He went on to argue that it was only held together by American hegemony and that now this system no longer works and has been ruptured.
He spoke of a new order (something he had called a new world order in China) which would encompass values, such as respect for human rights, sustainable development, solidarity, sovereignty and territorial integrity of the various states.He cited Vaclav Havel’s parable of the shopkeeper in the world taking down his communist sign ‘workers of the world unite’, and ‘living within a lie’. He spoke of how we need to take our signs down – to no longer believe the lie.
He then went on to argue, “But more recently, great powers have begun using economic integration as weapons, tariffs as leverage, financial infrastructure as coercion, supply chains as vulnerabilities to be exploited.“We largely avoided calling out the gaps between rhetoric and reality.”
He warned about individual countries defending their own fuel, food and defence by building their own fortresses, and suggested that ‘middle powers’ need to work together to build something more ambitious. The great powers, the US, Russia, China, could afford to go it alone – but the middle powers need to band together. In effect he was arguing that the US hegemony in the West was coming to an end.
He argued that Canada had seen this coming and was already adopting a policy that was both “principled and pragmatic” – including respect for human rights. In an interesting twist he quipped “we are no longer just relying on the strength of our values, but also the value of our strength”.That strength was to be military and economic. He told Davos that Canada had fast tracked one trillion dollars of investments in energy, AI and critical minerals. And had promised to double defence spending. Canada was supporting Ukraine, and standing with Greenland and Denmark.
And then he asked, for me, the key question, “What does it mean for middle powers to live the truth?”It means naming reality, acting consistently, building a new order of what we claim to believe in and reducing the leverage that enables coercion. He went on to present Canada as the example of “a pluralistic society that works” and a model of free speech, diversity and sustainability.
It was an impressive speech – at one level brutally honest and at another, hopefully inspirational … but … and you knew there would be a but! Let’s judge Mr Carney’s speech by his own standard and see if the ‘reality matches the rhetoric’. I will look at the Old Order, the values based New Order, the use of economic power for ideological coercion, and the main one – refusing to live by lies.
The Collapse of the Old Order
Carney is no outsider. Indeed, he was a key part of the old order. He worked for Goldman Sachs in Boston, London, New York, Tokyo, and Toronto before becoming in 2003 a deputy governor of the Bank of Canada. After various high posts in the Canadian financial system in 2013 he became the first non-British citizen to serve as governor of the Bank of England. After leaving the Bank of England, he took senior private and public roles focused on climate and finance, notably serving as the United Nations Secretary-General’s Special Envoy on Climate Action and Finance and holding leadership or board positions at Brookfield, Bloomberg, and other institutions. He then became party leader of the Canadian Liberal party before becoming prime minister. He is the perfect Davos man – the embodiment of the system he admitted has failed.
What media outlets failed to grasp was the enormity of what he was saying. The likes of the Guardian, the BBC, the New York Times etc have long taught the narrative that there was a real rules-based order until Donald Trump, the great disruptor came along. The irony is that Carney was arguing that that same old rules-based order was a fiction. Perhaps Trump has been the great exposer of that fiction? Many of us have been saying what Carney said for some time – but we were dismissed as populists, conspiracy theorists or fascists. But now that one of their own says it, suddenly it is an obvious truth!
As the commentator Konstantin Kisin tweeted, “Davos is basically all the people who have created the problems, denied their existence and then called us names for pointing them out … explaining what the problems are and how we desperately need to fix them.”
Without blinking an eyelid, the courtiers who were praising the emperor’s new clothes are now embracing the ‘nowhere man’ who says that the emperor has no clothes!
The Values of the New Order
In his visit to China where he signed a new deal with the CCP, Carney had spoken of a ‘new world order’. Clearly in the context he is including China as part of that New World Order. In signing a deal with Qatar – which included defence – he was also including the world’s biggest sponsor, along with Iran, of Islamist terrorism. It is hard to square this with Carney’s insistence that the New World Order would be based on human rights.
Carney attacked the US but gave China a free pass. Right on cue the representative from China addressed the delegates with some delightful Orwellian Newspeak – a real example of reality not matching the rhetoric. He described China as itself the defender of the rules-based international order. Not a word of correction from Mr Carney. When you only selectively ‘speak truth to power’ you are in reality playing the power game. Pragmatism triumphs over principle.
A year ago, Carney had described China as Canada’s biggest security threat. Now it is a ‘strategic partner’. Does the reality match the rhetoric? Carney says he stands with Ukraine, but then signs a deal with the country that is helping bankroll and equip Russia to destroy Ukraine. It seems that in the New World Order you can deal with the devil himself, as long as he gives you enough money to keep you in power.
Speaking of money, what most of the commentators have left out is Carney’s own financial interests in this New World Order. Carney was the Chair of Brookfield Asset Management. Brookfield is an investment company which a couple of months ago announced a $20 billion investment in Qatar (as well as the $23 billion it has invested in China) for helping with AI. Canada’s new deal with Qatar includes AI. Carney continues to have stock options and deferred share units in Brookfield to the tune of $6.8 million. The media quite rightly question the American president when he makes political decisions which seem to benefit his personal companies and wealth. The same standard should apply to the Canadian prime minister. At the very least there is a conflict of interest.
Incidentally Canada’s new deal with Qatar includes co-operating in defence technologies. How does helping an authoritarian anti-democratic government, who are also the world’s largest sponsor of terrorism, fit in with the human rights ‘values’ of Carney’s New World Order?
The Use of Economic Power for Ideological Coercion
Part of Carney’s concern was the view that the world had now changed so that economic power was being used for ideological coercion. Rather than being a profound insight it was either an admission of ignorance or one of the most hypocritical statements you will ever witness. I tend to think it was the latter given that as a former Goldman Sachs chairman of the Bank of England, Carney, as an intelligent man must have known it has been ever thus.
He himself was a strong advocate of the EU, whose main tool to enforce its ideology is economic coercion – just ask Hungary. Likewise, China doesn’t build roads and railways in Africa out of altruism. And the Western governments that offered charity to poorer nations were not doing so unconditionally. There are numerous instances of Western dominated groups offering aid on the condition that Western ‘values’ such as abortion and sexual ideology were part of the package.
Speaking of economic power, Canada is not the powerhouse that Carney portrayed. More than 75% of its trade is with the US and it desperately needs a trade deal with America. Canada is an economy which is run on a growing national debt and where most of the economic growth comes from one province, Alberta. Carney spoke of sustainability. In its current form Canada is not sustainable. The bubble of national debt will one day burst – unless they sell it all to China.
Meanwhile there is an enormous danger that Canada will become so economically tied to China that it will be unable to resist China’s political demands e.g. over Taiwan. Again, it was notable that while Carney spoke of the right of Greenlanders and Danes to determine their own future, he said nothing about the Taiwanese.
I am reminded of the Who’s ever great song “Won’t Get Fooled Again”. Meet the new order. Same as the old order.
Refusing to Live by Lies
In a speech which is based on honesty and truth you would expect that the truth would be told, even if it is just in generalised terms or therapeutic memes. But Carney did not speak the truth in several instances. For example, he claimed that “We are fast-tracking a trillion dollars of investment in energy, AI, critical minerals, new trade corridors and beyond.” But it does not appear that there is a trillion dollars of investment to be fast tracked! According to the Canadian Parliamentary Budget Office’s 2025 review the figure is nearer $165 billion. If that’s the case, then $1 trillion is just wishful thinking. Treating fantasy wishes as economic reality is hardly a model for the honesty that Carney is talking about. Imagine if I went to him as a banker and said that I want to buy a $10 million dollar house, but I only have a salary that allows for $1 million and then tell him that I am aiming to have $10 million. I suspect my mortgage is not going to get approved!
What about Canada as the example of ‘a pluralistic society that works’? A model of free speech, diversity and sustainability? It’s difficult to know where to begin on this one. How about asking the Canadian truckers who were arrested and had their bank assets frozen because they were protesting against vaccine mandates in 2022? Or the fact that over 5% of deaths in Canada – some 16,000 people – occur because of government-approved euthanasia. If you are poor, sick, lonely or disabled, then Canadian ‘values’ encourage you to take your own life.
Canada is a country where live births are declining at the same time as abortions have increased to over 100,000. Its population is declining and its fertility rate is 1.25 children per year – the sustainability rate is 2.1. Canada is therefore not sustainable. Canadian values allow 45 men who self-identify as women to be in women’s prisons – including those convicted of violence and rape against women.
Canada is a great example of what happens to a society when it abandons its Christian heritage. Just as the globalists have killed globalism, so the progressives are killing progressivism. Once people see it in practice, they realise how dangerous and destructive it is. But where do they turn? Some of the alternatives are chilling – witness the rise of Islam, the growing acceptance of the Green religion, the lure of fantasy socialism, and the appeal of the real Far Right. But there is a better alternative, the way of Christ.
A Christian Perspective
Rod Dreher has an insightful book, Live not by Lies, which is helpful for Christians as we seek to navigate these troubled cultural waters. He examines how therapeutic culture, identity politics, and technology enable a “totalitarian temptation” that demands ideological allegiance over truth. The new alliance of Canada with China, Qatar and soon the EU is an example not of freedom loving liberal democracies based on Christian values, but rather all four are different types of authoritarianism. If you want to choose this world’s empires then you can choose the Communist model (China), the Islamist model (Qatar), the TB (technocratic/bureaucratic) model (the EU) or the progressive model (Canada). They are really all just different shades of grey (or red). What they all have in common is the centralisation of power, an elite class, state-controlled economies, constrained freedoms (including freedom of speech), and dreams of empire.
Is the American empire then the answer? America is different in some respects – it is clearly influenced by the TB and Progressive models. Islam is on the rise in the US but is still not a primary influence (except on the rise in anti-semitism in US campuses and Qatar’s $100 billion investment in those same universities). Communism was irrelevant but the rise of Mamdani and the ignorance of most young Americans about communism is a concern. America’s great saving grace at the moment is its unerring constitutional commitment to freedom of speech. It is still possible to speak the truth. Yet the American empire, though still the strongest in the world, is waning. It is in danger of being an empire based solely on wealth and real estate, not Christian values. An empire led by a man who at best comes across as a self-obsessed narcissistic bully.
I am reminded of Revelation 17 and 18 where the fall of Babylon is celebrated. Babylon was a place where every evil was committed and where “the merchants of the earth grew rich from her excessive luxuries” (Revelation 17:3). Yet in one hour she was brought to ruin!
Is there hope? Yes, but it is not in Carney’s Brave New World. China, the EU, Iran and Canada. It is not in the American empire. These are all destined to fall. Maybe God will raise up new hope in Africa, South America, Asia or Australia … but these too will ultimately fall. But there is another kingdom – one that is not of this world but is for this world. That is the Kingdom of Jesus Christ. That is the only hope for all our nations and all our people. By 2030 it is estimated that China will be the largest Christian nation in the world. It is estimated that more than two thirds of the mosques in Iran have closed and more than a million Iranian Muslims have become Christians. In the EU there has been a resurgence of interest in Christianity – especially among young people. There is even hope for Canada because while the death embrace of progressivism has killed off most of the mainstream denominations, there are new green shoots of biblical Christianity springing up.
No, our hope is not in Carney’s empty and hypocritical rhetoric. Our hope is in Christ and his Word. He shall reign for ever and ever – whatever the passing fads of this world. Hallelujah!
David Robertson is the former minister of St Peters Free Church in Dundee and a former Moderator of the Free Church of Scotland. He is currently the minister of Scots Kirk Presbyterian Church in Newcastle, New South Wales, and blogs at The Wee Flea.
Beauty for Ashes 15 – The New World Order – Greenland, Canada and Uganda
Fantastic to have you writing a bit more, recently, David.
An insightful and brilliant article that exposes the hypocritical nature of the vast majority of what we are hearing from our present day so called “leaders!”
When we read the true reality of where Carney has come from and where he is today, his pronouncings are but empty words which like many today are all for the promotion of self. Hence the standing ovation from the elites of Davos! Is it any wonder that we hear the mantra today from many of the “ordinary” on our streets, “we cannot trust any of our politicians today?”
As you rightly state, “our hope is in Christ and His Word.” Here is One we can trust! Here, and only here, is where we can find absolute “Truth!”
Thank you once again for your work and the information you provide. You shed much needed light in a very dark and confusing time! May the Lord bless you.
Thank you David . Brilliant article again
An excellent dissection of Carney’s speech , and with a sound conclusion ! Sad that Carney ran from the “Devil” he knew to the one he does not truly wish to know.
Thanks for this insightfiul analysis against Carney’s history!
Carney simply sees which way the wind may now be blowing and, like all of his kind, is manoeuvring to preserve his position and privileges. People like him are never sorry for what they have done, only sorry that they have been caught.
What I find really depressing is the number of purported Christians who cannot see through this nonsense and who appear to place more faith in global institutions than they do in God.
Excellent, discerning article. So many within our Church’s fall for the narrative from the mainstream media, but thank God there are many avenues on social media that do speak truth. Let us keep spreading it!
Thank you.
I find it extraordinary that Mr Carney was not elected as an MP first; rather he became the leader of his party then Prime Minister, without ever having held a Parliamentary seat! This does note forbode well, if an unelected person can become Prime Minister without ever serving his country first as a regular MP.
Yes Canada where they now murder around 15,000 annually through their MAID (medically assisted induced dying) programme. Canada, one of the wokest and most liberal countries on earth! Canada that gave us Justin Trudeau and now Mark Carney. No doubt about it, Canada is leading the new world order and leading the world straight into the arms of the antichrist and beast system that is rapidly coming upon us. Utter tragedy but no surprise, many in the church, loving it and lapping it up, just as they will love, welcome and follow the antichrist when he finally appears. There is a simple way for a Christian to avoid persecution and insults from the world today. And that way is to compromise and go with the flow of the world, all the while still claiming to belong to Him. The first ones judged and thrown into hell according to the Bible are the cowards, those who compromised and were overcome by the fear of man. Mark Carney’s speech was straight from the pit, yet masqueraded as an angel of light. Only those who love the truth could see right through it and through him. Lines are being drawn now by God Himself and just as the Levites of old crossed the line to follow Moses, so the true church must cross the line and stand for God, even if it means becoming enemies of our own brothers and sisters.
Good morning Guy. I have just lately become interested in matters of the cloth , etc. I read your comments with interest and you are obviously very exercised by the comments made by Mr Carney. In my limited experience I can see his speech was very worldly, and Canada has an unenviable attitude to assisted suicide, but I’m extremely interested in how you associate the speech with elements such as the antichrist. Could you elaborate on this for me please? Also could say how you see the speech as coming from the pit? Also the statement you make about making enemies with our brothers and sisters?
Thank you
Iain
Why would you lie so blatantly? I just googled Trudeau‘‘s speech from 2018 and watched the end. Literally no one stood. You also lied about the MAID program in Canada and lied about other things. It is sad that a pastor would lie like that. Here is Trudeau‘s speech in Davos. Btw, google will tell you the name of the 2 who got a standing ovation before Carney. https://m.youtube.com/watch?t=1372&fbclid=IwY2xjawPjkkhleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBzcnRjBmFwcF9pZA80MDk5NjI2MjMwODU2MDkAAR4H5qXdWWZ7zGOjQDL0TI-NEk3LNQVbPHS03vn94CBLUZrrPM5jDqpzAhIERw_aem__zrfavidpL0vjh9DkDeQiw&v=XV6mmpPVU-U&feature=youtu.be
Thanks for that Paul….but you need to take a chill pill and not be so quick to run to the ‘you’re a liar’ attack. I made a mistake on the Trudeau speech – it was widely applauded but did not receive a standing ovation (as the report I read had stated). I made a mistake – which is very different from blatantly lying. That part has now been corrected.
Please feel free to let me know where I ‘lied about the MAID program. Provide some evidence. And what other things did I lie about? You need to provide evidence and examples…not just abuse and accuse….
I provided evidence about Trudeau. Who did you read that said that Trudeau got a standing ovation.
The rules for MAID are available online and they are nothing like you have stated. You made quite accusations about MAiD, where did you get your information and why didn’t you fact check it? You did not provide proof you just ‘abused and accused’.
https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/health-services-benefits/medical-assistance-dying.html
Yes – and I accepted your evidence….I got it wrong and made a mistake. I have read the rules of MAID and what I said was true. 5% of deaths in Canada are by MAID. 16,000 people have been killed. There have been several recent reports of involuntary euathanasia….I am sure you can find them – if you want it. It is an immoral and sick system which discriminates against the sick, the poor, the lonely and the disabled.
Iain, you say this about MAID in Canada
“If you are poor, sick, lonely or disabled, then Canadian ‘values’ encourage you to take your own life.”
That is quite an accusation. Please provide proof of this claim. I know lots of people who fit those categories and not one of them has been encouraged to choose MAID. You move the goalposts by saying that there accounts online of involuntary euthanasia. I guess you have fact checked those claims? If it is true, it would be 2 medical doctors going rogue, risking their medical license and jail. It is not a Canadian value to force anyone to euthanasia.
Your whole point about Carney being part of the system that failed so he can’t be the one to help fix it is ironic. Christianity celebrates people who were part of the system that failed but brought about change. You know, people like Luther. When you were the moderator of the free Church of Scotland. Did you try and bring about change. But you were part of the old system that was broken.
For someone who lives on the other side of the world, you seem to be quite the expert and critic about Canada. You have a degree in theology. Do you have one in finance? Carney said that Canada is a middle power. You say it is not because it is running a deficit. Tell me Iain, how many countries do not have an annual deficit? The US deficit is about 1 trillion a year. So I guess it is not an economic superpower?
This is the first article of your I have read. Are you this harsh on the church you pastor and the denomination you are part of?
Who is Iain?!
Yes Canada’s MAID is an attack on the poor, the sick, the lonely and the disabled.
It’s not much of a logical position to claim that you know lots of these people who have not been offered MAID. I know lots of women who have not been raped but I would not say that rape does not exist because of my own limited experience!
And yes – lots of Canadian doctors could go rogue. I think of the documentary I saw about one such who boasted how many euthanasias she had done. There are numerous reports in newspapers just now of horrific stories – but here are some examples from the BMJ – https://spcare.bmj.com/content/early/2026/01/27/spcare-2025-006046
The trouble with Carney is that he is not a Reformer seeking to bring about change – he wants a return to the old system – where he and his corrupt elite – ran the show. He is no Luther…he is more Counter Reformation!
I never said that Canada is not a middle power – there you go again…just making up things to argue against! Nor did I say it was not a middle power (which it is by the way) because it has a deficit. The Canadian and the US deficits are of great concern. At some point someone is going to have to pay.
And yes I am just as ‘harsh’ on the church and denomination I pastor in. We have to take the beam out of our own eyes. In fact I would say I am a lot harsher. Your idea that criticising a political speech made to a bunch of rich people is ‘harsh’ suggests to me that you have very little real life experience!
Hi Iain, more than happy to elaborate and answer questions to those who are “genuinely” interested?
The Bible says we do not fight against flesh and blood but against demons, principalities, powers and dark forces in the heavenly realms (many Christians seem to have forgotten this) so behind any ideology, any belief systems etc. is a spirit and the Bible looks at things spiritually first. The Bible says the whole world lies under the evil one (satan) and his forces. For example, when Israel was worshipping idols, God said they had a spirit of whoring in them, so God was getting at the spiritual root of the matter. Another example from Israel is they copied the sins of the nations around them, and they sacrificed their children to molech. This is happening again in our day (there is nothing new under the sun) but today we call it abortion and a woman’s right to choose. I believe God views it the same way He always viewed it, sacrificing your child to molech. This may seem extreme, but I believe it is the truth. Of course, thanks be to Jesus who can forgive and cleanse us from ALL sin, but we first have to acknowledge our sin then repent of it to be forgiven. Only those who believe in and speak from the Bible and God can claim truth and can be examples of His light. So, in that sense Carney’s speech was from the pit as it had the wisdom of the world and nothing of God, His truth and His light. I also believe we are in what the Bible calls the last days (restoration of Israel a major sign of this) and if I am right, then the Bible says there will be ten nations that voluntarily gave their power to the beast (satan) and that out of this will arise the antichrist and the world will worship and follow him. I believe the spirit of humanism is the antichrist spirit and it is this spirit that produces humanism, wokeism, liberalism, political correctness and all the other ism’s that are rampant now mainly in western societies. This spirit is also the spirit of Greece, but God promises to raise up the sons of Zion against the sons of Greece. So, if your speech perfectly aligns with this spirit then you are aligning yourself with the antichrist spirit and therefore it is straight from the pit but appears to be light and truth, just like how satan operates. The Bible also says in the last days many Christians will apostatize from the faith and will fall away by listening to doctrines of demons. This IS happening now also, and the true church must separate herself from these apostates, like the Levites did when Israel sinned with the golden calf. We have to acknowledge they are our enemies and NOT our brothers and sisters anymore, because they have not loved the truth but have believed in and followed the antichrist spirit. Of course, we have to love our enemies, but we have to now separate ourselves and acknowledge that they are enemies and not the true church. God tells us in these days “come out from her my children, lest you share in her sins” Hope that helps answer your questions?
Thank you for this detailed reply Guy.
Two Different Questions
David Robertson makes a crucial point: Christians should not view politicians as saviours, since only Jesus deserves that trust. However, he seems to confuse two questions and allows his personal views to influence both answers.
The first question is whether Mark Carney is correct about global politics. As American influence declines, should countries like Canada work more closely with others? How can they stay safe and prosperous? These are difficult questions, and Christians may not all agree.
The second question is whether we should place our ultimate hope in any political leader. The answer is no. Every government will eventually fail, but God’s kingdom lasts forever.
Both questions are important. However, Robertson appears to assume that because Carney supports policies Robertson opposes—such as abortion or euthanasia—his ideas on foreign policy must also be incorrect. Instead, we should assess Carney’s proposals fairly: Could cooperation among middle powers work? Do the investment figures add up? What are the actual trade-offs with partners like Qatar?
There’s a risk when we conflate our religious beliefs with our political preferences. We might imply that being a faithful Christian requires certain political views. But the gospel calls us to keep our hope in Christ while thinking carefully about global challenges, even when proposals come from people whose policies we oppose.
I don’t confuse two questions. I am perfectly aware of what they are. No problem at all with Canada working more closely with other countries. I do have a problem with those countries including China and Qatar – especially when you say that your policy is based on human rights!
“Robertson’ does not assume that because Carney is pro abortion and pro-euthanasia (policies incidentally which Jesus would oppose) that his foreign policy ideas must be wrong. If you are going to patronise at least get your facts right and don’t lie about those you patronise. My concern with Carney is his vested self interest – with his companies having billions in both China and Qatar – his lies and his statement that he is doing this because of human rights. Perhaps you should read articles before commenting on them?
Being a faithful Christian does require certain views which are deemed political….for example there is no saviour but Christ, abortion is evil and killing people except in self defence is wrong. You have a rather simplistic view of politics and a rather confused view of Christianity. It seems that your politics is determining your Christianity…
Please show me where Carney said that he is trading with China and Qatar “because of human rights”.
It is ironic that you say “If you are going to patronise at least get your facts right and don’t lie about those you patronise.”
Paul…I am sure you are capable of reading his speech – it is easily available online. He spoke of a new way based amongst other things on human rights. As part of that he lauded his deals with Qatar and China. As I said get your facts right.
David, you write harshly about Mark Carney, a man who cannot respond and you bash Canada.
I have written two replies that you have chosen to not post because I use your own words against you.
Paul,
I was travelling to Scotland and didn’t really have time to update this website. You don’t use my own words against me…you make things up. If you continue to lie and abuse I won’t be posting any more of your remarks.
“Or the fact that over 5% of deaths in Canada – some 16,000 people – occur because of government-approved euthanasia. If you are poor, sick, lonely or disabled, then Canadian ‘values’ encourage you to take your own life.”
Actually … given Canada’s health care system, it’s probably more accurate to say Canadian ‘values’ encourage you to let the Canadian government kill you. Even more compassionate!
Nosey Iain here – what are you up to in Scotland?
Thank you for explaining this so well,. Jesus is the answers